- Sep 6, 2005
- 145,295
- 95,152
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Not sure. Can't read just text while driving. Was a breaking news alert from The Score
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I know it is a dome, and to be honest have not checked what the weather is like, but was thinking more travel issues.Not sure if serious?
Why don't they make the rule for bad divisions if your record is under. 500 then you must go over. 500 in games outside the division to make the playoffs? Just add another wildcard team if they don't and the best wildcard team gets home game wildcard round. Thoughts?
Why don't they make the rule for bad divisions if your record is under. 500 then you must go over. 500 in games outside the division to make the playoffs? Just add another wildcard team if they don't and the best wildcard team gets home game wildcard round. Thoughts?
For a competition where there's only half as many regular season games as there is teams the NFL Conference/Division structure is very good in creating a competition that has genuine rivalries and that has an inherent long term fairness in determining firstly who qualifies for the post season and secondly a deserved overall winner. I don't really understand why it should be changed with the only exception perhaps being that home field advantage in the wildcard round should go to the team with the best W/L record rather than automatically going to the division winnerIMO the system isn't broken so there's no need to fix it. As far as I know the only team to make the playoffs is the 7-9 Seattle Seahawks in 2010/11 and they actually won a post season game.
If you start making arguments about teams in weak division not making the playoffs, what about the divisions who played those teams 4 times? is their record going to be reduced because they had an easy ride?