Opinion 2023 AFL Draft Prospects
- Thread starter Dav1d
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- May 23, 2019
- 11,716
- 28,392
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Aren't we developing Croft as a key defender?
- Sep 21, 2016
- 1,118
- 1,696
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Its why I'm I this board, i love talkin about the doggies and footy in general.happy with that - pretty much the reason the board exists
I trust Sammy, and he's way smarter than me, but if I had a crack, i would of traded Smithy to the hawks for their pick 4 and a F1 for a multitude of reasons.
SalaryCap: the dogs can't pay The Bont,Astro,Marra, English and Smithy all 1 million each, and Smithy isn't really worth it.
Draft picks: potentally pick 4 McKercher Hawks F1 + 12 +19, instead of pick 6 minus F1.
Suspect GC trade some of those 2nd rounders down into multiple picks ahead of ours once draft starts, so if they have to match Walters, Read and Rogers before Croft we’ll be laughing.
Could see Hawks with 44, 47 & 49 and Lions with 39, 51 & 54 looking at moving up to a GC pick the 20s.
Could see Hawks with 44, 47 & 49 and Lions with 39, 51 & 54 looking at moving up to a GC pick the 20s.
Last edited:
Would be great to get Mitch Edwards on the list developing as English’s understudy / successor.
He seems to have dropped out of first round discussion. So might be available later on.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
He seems to have dropped out of first round discussion. So might be available later on.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Still holding out hope we can / will trade up for Collard as well.
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
- Oct 12, 2012
- 7,173
- 11,295
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
I just struggle to see the scenario where we can. If GC need more points it's because of 3 early bids on players - which are before Croft. So no use to us getting one of their second rounders for a group of our thirds, as it will get used on Croft matching. We can't wait until after Croft to do it as GCs picks have already been used to match by then.
Or am I missing another option?
_Cerberus_
Club Legend
- Sep 30, 2022
- 2,277
- 4,290
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
One is a proven defender at recent level, the other is more speculative, in hope raw attributes can be converted from a forward to a defender again.
Murphy has runs on the board at under 18 level, proven man on man ability, and intercept ability despite his slight build. Croft hasn't played defence since he was a kid/under 16s. If Croft wasn't a father son, and we had pick 15 and wanted a defender. I'd pick Murphy every time, because I would be more sure of what we are getting. (O'Sullivan will go top 10)
We are banking on Croft being able to convert back into a defender, only out of necessity due to our stacked forward line.
You have a good read on draftees more then most on here. I am curious if you know why he was moved out of being a defender? Wasn't good at it? Coaches see tall boy and think "tall = forward"?
But of course we are taking Croft now, as he is a free hit, so zero complaints. Murphy/Wilson would have been my two preferences if we still had our first pick. Croft has the attributes to play defence, but whether they translate to man on man ability, and read of the ball who knows. Think he will be two years away from playing, still a pretty slight build. Thankfully Jones has a couple of seasons left in him, thus time on his side.
And we get a good player at pick 5, out of Watson or Sanders. So trade period worked out well in the end.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #2,687
Murphy looks kinda goofy and awkward in defense whenever I’ve seen him so he probably will be a gun lol
O'Sullivan would be the one I’d want out of all the key position players in this draft after Walter obviously
O'Sullivan would be the one I’d want out of all the key position players in this draft after Walter obviously
_Cerberus_
Club Legend
- Sep 30, 2022
- 2,277
- 4,290
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
O'Sullivan is more AFL ready size wise. Though a few draft watchers seem to feel Murphy will end up better in the long run. Would not surprise me if both are gone inside the first dozen picks. Adelaide, Geelong, Sydney likely landing spots.
_Cerberus_
Club Legend
- Sep 30, 2022
- 2,277
- 4,290
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
GWS have done well picking up good defenders who can lock a player down. Idun at pick 61, and Taylor at pick 28. Shows that you don't need to reach high for a defender. Plenty of value to be found in later rounds.
Same for small forwards in general. Feels like a fair few of the leagues best smalls were found outside the first round. Which is probably why even though I like us to get Watson. I wouldn't be to gutted if we don't.
Same for small forwards in general. Feels like a fair few of the leagues best smalls were found outside the first round. Which is probably why even though I like us to get Watson. I wouldn't be to gutted if we don't.
I think Reid, McKercher and Duursma are gone with the first 3 live picks, leaving us with watson or sanders anyway. Unless eagles trade down to 2 and take Curtin, in which case McKercher or duursma slips to 4 which would be nice - for hawthorn
Last edited:
CaptainMurphy
Norm Smith Medallist
Veteran
Western Bulldogs - Ed Richards Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Nathan Mullenger-McHugh Player Sponsor 2018
Western Bulldogs - Nathan Mullenger-McHugh Player Sponsor 2017
Western Bulldogs - Bailey Dale Player Sponsor 2017
Western Bulldogs - Mitch Honeychurch Player Sponsor 2017
- Jun 4, 2015
- 5,575
- 7,414
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Combined rankings from 7 responses is:
1. McKercher (33)
2. Watson (24.5)
3. Sanders (18.5)
4. Curtin (17)
5. Duursma (12)
1. McKercher (33)
2. Watson (24.5)
3. Sanders (18.5)
4. Curtin (17)
5. Duursma (12)
I think the lesson there is to look at what certain recruiters are looking for in players, rather than talent in certain positions is available until late in the draft.
You can mount an argument for almost any position being available later in the draft at this point. KPFs (Larkey, Lewis, Mihocek, etc), Rucks (McInerney, etc), KPDs (Collins, Wilkie, etc), half backs (Dale, Daniel, etc), half forwards (Schultz, Butler, etc), etc.
- May 23, 2019
- 11,716
- 28,392
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
Could even cherry pick late draft star mids in Touk Miller, Lachie Neale, Jordan Dawson
- Oct 9, 2014
- 12,463
- 22,048
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Sep 22, 2008
- 25,524
- 34,635
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Banned
- #2,698
When you look at the real top line inside mids which do it all, they almost always come very very high in the draft though. Bont, Petracca, Oliver, Dusty etc, couple of exceptions ie Butters & Danger out of the top 10 & Neale & Fyfe etc later. But almost always come top 5 IMO.
Which is why I’m leaning towards Sanders, we may not get another chance up here and whilst we can win a flag with decent small forwards ie hopefully Clarke & AJ etc, I don’t think you can win a flag without a gun inside mid
Which is why I’m leaning towards Sanders, we may not get another chance up here and whilst we can win a flag with decent small forwards ie hopefully Clarke & AJ etc, I don’t think you can win a flag without a gun inside mid
Graeme Cook
Debutant
- May 15, 2022
- 141
- 204
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
3 Tasmanians in the top 15 draft absolutely a waste of time talking about drafting them.
They will be the Tasmanian teams 1st priority and the AFL will bend over backwards to get them home.
They will be the Tasmanian teams 1st priority and the AFL will bend over backwards to get them home.
- Sep 14, 2015
- 5,150
- 15,130
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
If they are best available I reckon you still take them.
If worst case scenario is 4 good years out of a gun mid, then pick 1 or 2 in 4 years time, that is still a good result.
