clap, clap - here he is! On que
Got that right!
Right on cue .... in a bid to derail another thread!
Anyways, hope big Toby is primed for another big one today, will need it going one out!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
clap, clap - here he is! On que
Yes it could be Jackson, Jacob, Jacquin,or it could be Larry.
Seemed very specific to me and when you check their posting history in relation to me, it's pretty transparent there's a connection.
Anyways jake has left the forum for thr time being with tale between legs after he misrepresented facts.
I've got no mates!
I think his name is scott...no friends
i'll see myself out
Except for you Goldie...stick together thro' thick and thin...Startling admission .. I've got no mates.
I'll let that go through to the keeper.
You just out of the blue revealed JakLying to be Jake ... bt don't know him. Quite odd revealing someone's name in a thread!
Revealing someone's identity? Surely not?
We'll be ok!Except for you Goldie...stick together thro' thick and thin...
I reckon that...sorry who is this thread about again??
Jake King? Thought he retired.about Jake? No idea what happened in here.
Jake King? Thought he retired.
Absolutely, Jacobs will probably win the hit outs but Toby will be super competitive and damaging around the ground.yeah him, and still causing trouble...so back to Toby...he has a big job today.
I reckon that...sorry who is this thread about again??
And...... you may wonder if our dependence on the Tobster is lost on Adelaide - bet old Toby gets hammered today - sadly.Absolutely, Jacobs will probably win the hit outs but Toby will be super competitive and damaging around the ground.
lol.Insightful? And your post adds .. exactly what?
Maybe. I don't know. Hope not but I do know that he'll give all he's got.And...... you may wonder if our dependence on the Tobster is lost on Adelaide - bet old Toby gets hammered today - sadly.
Link please as the AFL statement is what counts as they compiled the stats. Now read the statement again.It was said in the media multiple times, that the rule was brought in to prevent injury as well
it's like they're the old folk in Charlie and the Chocolate Factory and sleep in the same bed.clap, clap - here he is! On que
Mate I don't like you go away and leave me alone.Link please as the AFL statement is what counts as they compiled the stats. Now read the statement again.
Statistics show there is no link between the controversial tactic and clearances, and medical advice was that injuries had not increased because of the spike
Here is your stupid linkLink please as the AFL statement is what counts as they compiled the stats. Now read the statement again.
Statistics show there is no link between the controversial tactic and clearances, and medical advice was that injuries had not increased because of the spike