Autopsy AFL 2022 Round 10 - Cats v Port Sat May 21st 1:45pm EST (GMHBA)
- Thread starter Wosh
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- May 3, 2007
- 36,604
- 21,198
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Man City, Valencia, Lazio, Panthers
Scomo is like $3.50 to win the election tonight lol.
Put $1 million on it and you will be a multi millionaire lol
- Oct 9, 2003
- 45,029
- 42,842
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Eagles (NFL), Suns (NBA)
Is this a final? Rohan with 3 kicks
- Jan 23, 2007
- 4,552
- 3,138
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Surely the effective tackle comes before the in the back.
Bews arm was there first defending. He didn't knock the ball out.
Dirty Bird
Pokémon Master
That was one of those 50/50 calls
Both frees are legitimate.
Ideal would've been a ball up. But there, one group of fans is gonna bitch either way (And rightfully so)
Dissent dissent!!
If a vic team copped just one of the horrendous calls, not the contentious 50/50 calls I mean the outrageous calls, that port copped today the media would be all over it during the week.
A team cops 2 of the outrageous calls we copped today there would be an insane furore kicked up.
We’ve copped dozens of horrendous calls today, the types that most clubs cop 4-8 of in their entire season, we cop thst many in one game.
A team cops 2 of the outrageous calls we copped today there would be an insane furore kicked up.
We’ve copped dozens of horrendous calls today, the types that most clubs cop 4-8 of in their entire season, we cop thst many in one game.
That literally came off his teammate then
What else do u expect at this cheat ground 
What ******* insane logic is this?
So you can reach well over the mark, hold a player, then knock the ball out of his hands and it’s ok … if the arm was there defending?
Sorry Pussy Cats but you must be the greatest free kick winners on earth, Tom Hawkins must have statistics that tell that his goal scoring prowess is mainly because of the free kicks he wins, for arm knocking over the shoulder or some other kind of bulldust free the ump can pick out.
TOM IS NOT TO BLAME FOR BEING THE BEST FREE KICK GOAL SCORER GOING AROUND , EXCEPT WHEN HE MARKS 9 METRE KICKS OR PUSHES AN OPPOPNENT CLEAN IN THE BACK BUT GETS NOTHING BUT A SHOT AT GOAL. sorry for the caps accident.
But I saw Tom get a goal while both players were contesting but Hawkins is that wide that really the free kick name for Tom Hawkins should be made as Tom free kick because his opponent tried to defend against him.
Now why doesn't Franklin get those frees, last night he caught two Carlton blokes clean as a whistle and got nothing , NOTHING,
bUT tOM hAWKINS ONLY HAS TO RUN AT THE BALL AND GETS A FREE.
I THINK THAT THE DEFENDER SHOULD GET SOME LEWAY IN THE WAY THE UMPIRES CAN EASILY PICK A FREE FOR tOM BECAUSE IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME, TOO MANY FREE KICKS, FROM DEFENDING, OH bloody caps again. After Toms adventures I saw two or three frees in a row to Geelong now outdoing the WCE as the umpires favourite colour , or what ever it is that gets this club frees.
Then you see Tom later in that quarter appealing for a deliberate , really, does Scott train these boys to hunt free kicks down, ALL CLUBS DO IT, to a degree , but not like Geelong, and Selwood definitely practices free kick gathering by arm up shoulder drop and Dangermouse gets frees come out of his ears!!!
When will we get some help for defenders, because the idea of defending is to punch the ball away from the forward who usually playing to his team mates kick, who is usually in FRONT!
Surely the defender has to be given some allowances to hit a shoulder or an arm because it is UNFAIR.
Now don't get me wrong Tom is a great kick and can play the game really well, buthe has to have the limit as best goals numbers from frees.
In fact the whole AFL has too many goals from free kicks, and we know the gambling industry is burying itself in the AFL I wonder if there's big dough out for Scotts last harrah!
This is contravercial hey? Give it some comments. No don't get angry it happens to all defenders now!
TOM IS NOT TO BLAME FOR BEING THE BEST FREE KICK GOAL SCORER GOING AROUND , EXCEPT WHEN HE MARKS 9 METRE KICKS OR PUSHES AN OPPOPNENT CLEAN IN THE BACK BUT GETS NOTHING BUT A SHOT AT GOAL. sorry for the caps accident.
But I saw Tom get a goal while both players were contesting but Hawkins is that wide that really the free kick name for Tom Hawkins should be made as Tom free kick because his opponent tried to defend against him.
Now why doesn't Franklin get those frees, last night he caught two Carlton blokes clean as a whistle and got nothing , NOTHING,
bUT tOM hAWKINS ONLY HAS TO RUN AT THE BALL AND GETS A FREE.
I THINK THAT THE DEFENDER SHOULD GET SOME LEWAY IN THE WAY THE UMPIRES CAN EASILY PICK A FREE FOR tOM BECAUSE IT HAPPENS ALL THE TIME, TOO MANY FREE KICKS, FROM DEFENDING, OH bloody caps again. After Toms adventures I saw two or three frees in a row to Geelong now outdoing the WCE as the umpires favourite colour , or what ever it is that gets this club frees.
Then you see Tom later in that quarter appealing for a deliberate , really, does Scott train these boys to hunt free kicks down, ALL CLUBS DO IT, to a degree , but not like Geelong, and Selwood definitely practices free kick gathering by arm up shoulder drop and Dangermouse gets frees come out of his ears!!!
When will we get some help for defenders, because the idea of defending is to punch the ball away from the forward who usually playing to his team mates kick, who is usually in FRONT!
Surely the defender has to be given some allowances to hit a shoulder or an arm because it is UNFAIR.
Now don't get me wrong Tom is a great kick and can play the game really well, buthe has to have the limit as best goals numbers from frees.
In fact the whole AFL has too many goals from free kicks, and we know the gambling industry is burying itself in the AFL I wonder if there's big dough out for Scotts last harrah!
This is contravercial hey? Give it some comments. No don't get angry it happens to all defenders now!
- Aug 17, 2012
- 13,591
- 20,072
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
What a barrel
Miles off his line for that kick.
That's play on and no goal
That's play on and no goal
Surely that had to be “play on” kicked about 1 metre to the left of the mark. Yeah it makes it a slightly tougher angle, but avoids kicking over the man on the mark
- Jan 23, 2007
- 4,552
- 3,138
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
Cameron kicks 2 meters off his mark. Where was the play on?
- May 2, 2011
- 13,854
- 7,042
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- AUFC, CDFC, MUFC, Redbacks
I hate the cats & their ground, the year they finally bottom out will be good for the comp
Nope.
They mandated that you kick over the mark after the Pies and Saints sooked years ago because of franklin
- Jan 23, 2007
- 4,552
- 3,138
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
The umpires are a joke. They all line up behind and in front of the kicker. They even tell the kicker what he can and can’t do. Nek minute goes 2 metres to left of the mark. All good.
Nope. Can start of the “worse” side, and then kick over the mark, but can’t go off your line and not kick over the mark
But once the siren goes you can move off your line to snap around your body. As long as you don't advance to open up the angle. I'm thinking same theory here.
Similar threads
- Poll
- Poll
