boncer34
Formerly "Dos23"
TT htb was ordinary. Other than that it was fine.
Autopsy AFL 2023 Round 20 - Tigers v Demons Sun July 30th 3:20pm EST (MCG)
- Thread starter Wosh
- Start date
- Tagged users None
boncer34
Formerly "Dos23"
I'm not the one throwing a tantrum that a player on my team was correctly pinged HTB after diving for a free.
- Apr 14, 2014
- 5,883
- 11,190
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Glad you acknowledged the umpires in your win. See Dees supporters this is how you do it.
South of the Yarra
Premium Platinum
- Jul 23, 2006
- 11,033
- 18,304
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
A typical Martin game today flashy and good when the Tiger were up, nowhere to be found when the Dees lifted the tempo and the Tigers neede him. Went missing as usual. Symbolic of his career
Grockadoc
Brownlow Medallist
- Jul 25, 2008
- 25,248
- 48,155
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies, Man Utd, Cavaliers
My issue with the Taranto free is they pinged him for no attempt.
Nearly every time a Dees mid was pinged, they either let the ball go to drop it, or just took the tackle, neither are attempts to get rid of the ball and none of them got pinged for it.
It's dodgy af when they pull out a free out of nowhere that was let go for 70% of the game up until that point and then they don't pay it again afterwards.
I've been frustrated by Daniher's diving since he came to the club, and I've expressed that in the past.
I assume you feel the same way about this guy who plays for your club:
- Apr 14, 2014
- 5,883
- 11,190
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Are you in love with me Bonce? This ain't the way to woo me. Come up with a new strategy. Take a leaf out of the umpires book in today's game and get the momentum going in your favour.
There were countless others. Completely swinged the game.
People should know that Richmond never lose, it's always the umpires and the AFL.
I think holding the ball for prior opportunity would be a reasonable call (which doesn't need no genuine attempt for a free to be paid). I can't remember what the umpire said though.
Are you as equally frustrated with Neale, McLuggage, Hipwood and Zorko being serial divers?I've been frustrated by Daniher's diving since he came to the club, and I've expressed that in the past.
I assume you feel the same way about this guy who plays for your club:
Special mention to Charlie Cameron too
No one is saying that. You can't negate that you got one free ride, so you resort to strawman arguments. Enjoy the gift. They need you top 4 for finals.
Welcome to the rebuild zone.
When you lose by 5 goals you can't solely blame umpires
- Jun 14, 2017
- 3,519
- 5,611
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, AC Milan, North Adelaide
That was a finals type match and both teams had everything to play for. We prevailed in the end after being headed several times.
Grockadoc
Brownlow Medallist
- Jul 25, 2008
- 25,248
- 48,155
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies, Man Utd, Cavaliers
C'mon Bonce. You're better than this...
Shiel contest with Cotchin happened with 14:32 left on the clock in the first quarter.
Shiel played on AND kicked the VERY next goal of the game.
Shiel played the entirety of the 1st quarter and was involved in another heavy collision with Astbury with 10 seconds left of the quarter.
So, IF Cotchin DID concuss/snipe Shiel in that hit as you claim and Shiel played on afterwards:
1: The giants did not conduct a concussion test which is a mandatory 20 minute wait time. Shiel was on the field earlier than 20 minutes so no HIA was performed.
This means that:
1: The Giants doctors felt he was right to play.
2: The Giants doctors did a preliminary test, ignored Shiel's results and sent him back on to play.
3: The doctors did not wait long enough to observe any delayed onset symptoms which put Shiel at even more risk.
Or
4: The concussion happened after the hit with Astbury (after which point he was subbed out at quarter time.).
The first 3 are gross negligence grounds against the GWS doctors.
But number 4 is the most likely scenario.
Grockadoc
Brownlow Medallist
- Jul 25, 2008
- 25,248
- 48,155
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies, Man Utd, Cavaliers
Umpire said Taranto didn't make a genuine attempt. He never said it was due to prior opportunity.
- Apr 14, 2014
- 5,883
- 11,190
- AFL Club
- Richmond
You can only welcome someone to a place if you are already there. Hello fellow rebuilder.
Except we didn't, you Tigers supporters always play victim because you watch the game with one eye.
You played well but the better team stepped up when the game was there to be won.
Grockadoc
Brownlow Medallist
- Jul 25, 2008
- 25,248
- 48,155
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Fighting Furies, Man Utd, Cavaliers
Nice deflecting.
You'll never get a straight answer out of Cats fans, mate. They'll always deflect.
Like when they point out another player has pushed one of theirs in the back but go eerily silent and ignore when you raise Hawkins has probably kicked 350 goals pushing his opponents in the back and out of contests.
- Apr 14, 2014
- 5,883
- 11,190
- AFL Club
- Richmond
The umpires stepped up and your lot fell in behind the momentum shifts.
boncer34
Formerly "Dos23"
You keep replying.
Raised his arm and dropp
Yeah it used to be Stephen Hocking but not sure who is pulling the AFL strings these days
Similar threads
- Poll
