Shermanator
Confidence Coach
- Mar 23, 2001
- 15,319
- 48,902
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Wildcats/Pacers/Chelsea/Scorchers
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Watching it reminded me of Bruno's exclusive interview with Harrison FordCorrect response would be * off **********.
His time will comeShould of called him a c@cksucker.
I would have paid the fine for him.
After he asked for the 3rd time, I would have loved a "Mate, I told you straight up at the start that I can't comment on it. If it's brought up again I'm going to have to ask you to leave".Just watched the interview says at the beginning can’t say anything about the meeting.What are the first 3 or 4 questions about you think. How dumb are these people?
Just watched the interview says at the beginning can’t say anything about the meeting.What are the first 3 or 4 questions about you think. How dumb are these people?
Who was the older * head who kept asking deadshit questions
Fitting nameTony Tardio
*head is definitely the best description for that guyTony Tardio
Tony Tardio is absolutely one of those people whose brains were deep fried by Covid lockdowns.*head is definitely the best description for that guy
Yes I don’t follow him on Xitter but for some reason I see a lot of his Xits. He’s definitely gone to loony landTony Tardio is absolutely one of those people whose brains were deep fried by Covid lockdowns.
How does one abbreviate regarding tardio?Tony Tardio
Tony Tardio
We all feel pretty much the same about the "fAmiLy" club.
Nah. Nothing to do with any of that. Had a relative who played there.[moved my reply from another thread to stay on topic]
Yep, I've noticed that. Seems like a lot of misplaced rage to me. Shιt happens. Seems pretty knee-jerk for North fans to go nuclear about it just because Clarko signed a contract with you later that year. You guys act like you're the only victims. It was bad for everyone, FFS.
I'm unsure what people thought Hawthorn should've done differently. Should we have ignored Cyril and not conducted a soul-searching review into past racism? Our club was trying improve things; trying to be better as a football club. They went into it in good faith.
There was no sweeping things under the rug once the Binmada report came back. The club handballed it over to the AFL in exact accordance with the AFL's own guidelines. The AFL then chose to sit on it for a month or two, which is why Phil Egan leaked it to the ABC journo and lit the fuse. Not our fault.
You could argue we shouldn't have chosen Binmada to conduct the review, but they were gold standard for that type of stuff, used by many businesses and departments looking to improve their policies in relation to First Nation people. It turns out they are shake down artists and Phil Egan is a crook. How were we to know that?
Maybe the club admin was gullible and naive not consider what might occur if serious racism accusations were levelled by ex-players at our former coaches in the Binmada Report. But who the f**k could see any of that coming? I doubt anyone had even considered the possibility of serious human rights abuses.
You live and learn, I guess. 17 other clubs have learned from Hawthorn's naivety and now nobody will address the past wrongs their clubs may have committed. We can shut the door forever on that. Don't ask. Don't tell.
Go on... Tell the story.Nah. Nothing to do with any of that. Had a relative who played there.
[moved my reply from another thread to stay on topic]
Yep, I've noticed that. Seems like a lot of misplaced rage to me. Shιt happens. Seems pretty knee-jerk for North fans to go nuclear about it just because Clarko signed a contract with you later that year. You guys act like you're the only victims. It was bad for everyone, FFS.
I'm unsure what people thought Hawthorn should've done differently. Should we have ignored Cyril and not conducted a soul-searching review into past racism? Our club was trying improve things; trying to be better as a football club. They went into it in good faith.
There was no sweeping things under the rug once the Binmada report came back. The club handballed it over to the AFL in exact accordance with the AFL's own guidelines. The AFL then chose to sit on it for a month or two, which is why Phil Egan leaked it to the ABC journo and lit the fuse. Not our fault.
You could argue we shouldn't have chosen Binmada to conduct the review, but they were gold standard for that type of stuff, used by many businesses and departments looking to improve their policies in relation to First Nation people. It turns out they are shake down artists and Phil Egan is a crook. How were we to know that?
Maybe the club admin was gullible and naive not consider what might occur if serious racism accusations were levelled by ex-players at our former coaches in the Binmada Report. But who the f**k could see any of that coming? I doubt anyone had even considered the possibility of serious human rights abuses.
You live and learn, I guess. 17 other clubs have learned from Hawthorn's naivety and now nobody will address the past wrongs their clubs may have committed. We can shut the door forever on that. Don't ask. Don't tell.
It wasn't like Hawthorn deliberately targeted Clarkson with all of this. Yet that's how many of you seem to have reacted.
Clarkson was a part of the Hawthorn "fAmiLy"... just like Fagan was a part of the Hawthorn "fAmiLy"... just like Cyril was a part of the Hawthorn "fAmiLy"... just like Jermain Miller-Lewis was a part of the Hawthorn "fAmiLy"... just like Carl Peterson was a part of the Hawthorn "fAmiLy"...
I wasn't aware there was ANY timeframe given. You just made that up.So, you're comfortable with the fact that everyone involved in preparing the report was happy to completely ignore that Kennett was the one who upset Cyril to the extent that he left the club, by sticking to a bogus timeframe that avoided scrutinising Jeff?
Or, in other words, "what people thought Hawthorn should've done differently" is that the review should have genuinely targeted the real source of the problem, not the scapegoats who were clearly specified by Jeff himself to be targeted. Yes, we weren't to know (then) that Phil Egan is a crook, but clearly Jeff knew he could be bought.