- Oct 18, 2013
- 101,487
- 155,004
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
Has to be Grundy from a match up perspective.
What do you mean? Why is Grundy so important for match ups?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Has to be Grundy from a match up perspective.
Why are we bringing Tomlinson back in? Wasn't it only last week where everyone was saying 'that's the last I want to see of Tommo?'. Obviously Petty's injury changes things. But I'd rather see Hibberd play on a tall than bring in Tommo.
We’re playing one of the few teams that plays two traditional rucks. Both are workhorses but both in good form. Their plan will undoubtedly be to work Gawn into the ground and leave a bit on him at every contest. All the forward options are shit, so we may as well play the guy who can play 20% of the game in the ruck when Gawn is off or dropping into the defensive hole.What do you mean? Why is Grundy so important for match ups?
We’re playing one of the few teams that plays two traditional rucks. Both are workhorses but both in good form. Their plan will undoubtedly be to work Gawn into the ground and leave a bit on him at every contest. All the forward options are s**t, so we may as well play the guy who can play 20% of the game in the ruck when Gawn is off or dropping into the defensive hole.
My biggest mare is Gawn at FF blocking JVR’s run and Grundy in the ruck, so it would have to be with Grundy playing 80% forward.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Don't think it matters tbh. Teams have tried to put a multiple guys on Gawn before and usually just means they overcommit and sacrifice elsewhere.We’re playing one of the few teams that plays two traditional rucks. Both are workhorses but both in good form. Their plan will undoubtedly be to work Gawn into the ground and leave a bit on him at every contest. All the forward options are s**t, so we may as well play the guy who can play 20% of the game in the ruck when Gawn is off or dropping into the defensive hole.
My biggest mare is Gawn at FF blocking JVR’s run and Grundy in the ruck, so it would have to be with Grundy playing 80% forward.
A scheme so crazy it may just work.The “move defender forward” trick worked real good with Harry Petty. Maybe Goody can makenlightening strike twice?
Put Lever as full forward.
And the competitiveness of Sam Weideman.All that's missing are the hands of Chris Dawes
and the kicking precision of Petracca.
Jordon is so much worse than Harmes. Harmes' disposal lets him down and he is low on confidence, but JJ is unfortunately a wet lettuce leaf of a footballer.
A scheme so crazy it may just work.
Jake combines the agility of Ben Brown, the explosive acceleration of Grundy and the kicking precision of Petracca.
All that's missing are the hands of Chris Dawes
And the competitiveness of Sam Weideman.
Guaranteed!Clarry Confirmed in this week?
Many thanks
In - Oliver, Schache, Hibberd
Out - JJ, Petty
Don't think we need a 3rd tall against the Blues as they only have Curnow and a resting Ruck as tall forward options
B - Hibberd, May, Rivers
HB - Salem, Lever, McVee
C - Hunter, Oliver, Langdon
HF - Chandler, Schache, Sparrow
F - Melksham, Van Rooyen, Pickett
FOL - Gawn, Petracca, Brayshaw
INT - ANB, Bowey, Smith, Harmes
SUB - JJ
Stevie May’s taken a few hangers this year? Him and Melkshakes kicking six a piece in the granny, what a story that would be! Big piss up at cheeseburger place grand final night!!!The “move defender forward” trick worked real good with Harry Petty. Maybe Goody can makenlightening strike twice?
Put Lever as full forward.
ur the same dude that told me this 4 weeks agoGuaranteed!
Don’t mind this. If not Brown then it’s certainly time to Back the Schach. Looks a nicely balanced side in paper.