Remove this Banner Ad

Opinion Changes vs Port

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vooligan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

And there's always someone who pretends to not what they are talking about but ultimately they are shown to be talking shit......congrats
Proves my point ....can't spell :)

Broke my new years resolution .....Damn !!
 
there's always a dunce in the class ...congrats

We're not past the first round and JPod played 1 1/2 trial games ........so on that basis no not enough
I have no idea where you pulled that figure from. Actually maybe I do...

Pods played all 3 trial games. He was subbed off at 3 quarter time in the Carlton one.
 
I have no idea where you pulled that figure from. Actually maybe I do...

Pods played all 3 trial games. He was subbed off at 3 quarter time in the Carlton one.
sorry it was Betts i was thinking off ......was it 3/4 qtr time with the hip?
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

All teams we face that are genuine finals contenders have midfield quality and depth however it's time for our A Graders to step up and lead from the front

Again total respect to Port however I would back in Danger, Sloane, Thompson, Crouch and Douglas against Boak, Ebert, Cornes, Broadbent and Cassisi

Before anyone throws in Wingard and Hartlett these two traditionally play more of a High HF and Sweeping HB role respectively

Wines?
 
And there's always someone who pretends to know what they are talking about but ultimately they are shown to be talking shit......congrats

For example
I have no idea where you pulled that figure from. Actually maybe I do...

Pods played all 3 trial games. He was subbed off at 3 quarter time in the Carlton one.

sorry it was Betts i was thinking off ......was it 3/4 qtr time with the hip?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Did he mention this during the 'three things'? He would be very much in his right to not talk about the team's depth.
 
First I heard of a performance clause, think you are wrong on that one.

I find your last comment bizarre, where have you pulled that one from? You can either take a good contested mark or you can't. You don't need to fine tune it especially if you are a good contested mark. Besides you said he still had a good contested mark, there has been nothing shown this year to support that.
Pods was one of the leading contested markers in the game along with Cloke over his first couple of seasons (was definitely ranked top 3 for one or two of those seasons), it's always been a strength of his.
 
You know the great thing about being gracious in victory?

Victory

You should hear Money Mayweather wax lyrical about how amazing his opponent was in the post fight ringside interview - having just dominated them
Oh that's cool, but I wasn't talking to you
 
You know the great thing about being gracious in victory?

Victory

You should hear Money Mayweather wax lyrical about how amazing his opponent was in the post fight ringside interview - having just dominated them

Jimmy Bartel actually made that comment in the week leading up to the game, not after
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Pods was one of the leading contested markers in the game along with Cloke over his first couple of seasons (was definitely ranked top 3 for one or two of those seasons), it's always been a strength of his.

So you're saying that Geelong generally make good list decisions.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom