Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Take the best two mids out if any team (other than, maybe, the Bulldogs), and the depth that comes in is going to look shakey. It's not really a fair comparison.
I agree with your overall assertion that a dedicated defensive mid will be beneficial in the absence of Shuey and Yeo.
As a corollary to this, while getting Kelly looks like a masterstroke now, the intention of the trade was for him to play alongside the other two, not instead of them. If we can have all three fit and firing at the pointy end of the season, we will be hard to beat.
If so, it's a shame. But Vardy as the sub would be crazy so.....Winder the sub it is. Can't be Vardy. Can it? [emoji51]
Winder the sub it is. Can't be Vardy. Can it?![]()
Sheed is a pretty decent 4th mid.
Waterman in.
I think the reason we were happy to pay so much for Kelly is because he improved us for the now, but also saves us in the future. He and Yeo can lead our midfield for many years after Shuey retires (with Redden also due to go sooner rather than later, as they were both 2008 draft). If we didn't draft Kelly we would have a gaping hole in our midfield in about 1 to 2 years time.Take the best two mids out if any team (other than, maybe, the Bulldogs), and the depth that comes in is going to look shakey. It's not really a fair comparison.
I agree with your overall assertion that a dedicated defensive mid will be beneficial in the absence of Shuey and Yeo.
As a corollary to this, while getting Kelly looks like a masterstroke now, the intention of the trade was for him to play alongside the other two, not instead of them. If we can have all three fit and firing at the pointy end of the season, we will be hard to beat.
That's if Yeo's injury doesn't come back again. Could be a career killer. Fingers crossed.I think the reason we were happy to pay so much for Kelly is because he improved us for the now, but also saves us in the future. He and Yeo can lead our midfield for many years after Shuey retires (with Redden also due to go sooner rather than later, as they were both 2008 draft). If we didn't draft Kelly we would have a gaping hole in our midfield in about 1 to 2 years time.
The back line looks pretty settled.Strange call to bring Waterman in for Shuey but I'll back in the MC to know what they're doing.
Can't see Vardy being the medical sub as he'll offer no versatility, I reckon it'll be O'Neill. Maybe save Winder and Witherdon for a proper debut in the blue & gold.
Im not surprised Petch is still in. We are getting slower every week with our team selections. I wouldnt be shocked to see Bailey Williams in for a small forward or mid when he is ready.Brander to the inside and Waterman to the wing does sound likely based on the changes. Surprised Petch held his spot given he was fairly quiet on the weekend, but it’s obvious he’s doing a role we value internally so I’m not upset by that.
The saints don’t necessarily have the fastest midfield in the world and will try and play a contested game- so probably not the worst game to see how Brander goes.
In some ways Vardy would be a perfect medical sub in Simpson's eyes. 3/4 of the team are talls after all.Can't believe Simmo would backtrack on not debuting a player as a medical sub (if he really did say that).
Can't see what value there would be if Vardy was the medical sub. Although it would relieve Allen of the ruck duties if there's an early-ish injury.