Honestly, was VAR really brought in to disallow that when we're talking a couple of centimetres?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That was the linesman.Honestly, was VAR really brought in to disallow that when we're talking a couple of centimetres?
Good call.
So you want VAR to overturn a correct call?True, buy don't VAR check all calls anyway?
How? His body is facing towards the camera and his left toe is on the same line as the Hammers player, then his other knee is bent past that.The line of his knee is by the interpretation of the VAR ref, they draw a line within the program on a 2D picture.
As someone who works in 3d modelling and drafting, he's got that totally wrong.
No, I don't want VAR to overturn "correct" calls, but my point was that I don't think players should be called for offside for a bees dick offside if in fact that was offside. Most sports want to encourage more scoring but football, particularly through VAR, is actually creating the opposite effect.So you want VAR to overturn a correct call?
So your complaint is with the linesman for flagging him offside?No, I don't want VAR to overturn "correct" calls, but my point was that I don't think players should be called for offside for a bees dick offside if in fact that was offside. Most sports want to encourage more scoring but football, particularly through VAR, is actually creating the opposite effect.
Either or will do.
Easy to understand; the offside rule in general, be it the linesman or VAR and whoever is adjudicating and / or reviewing the decisions.Well I'm just trying to understand how this gripe is with VAR when the linesman has flagged for offside and VAR has shown him to be correct.
Easy to understand; the offside rule in general, be it the linesman or VAR and whoever is adjudicating and / or reviewing the decisions.
What's wrong? It's the same part of the arm they used.
Could have easily been a 5 to 4 sort of scoreline, was pretty end to end and we rode our luck in the 2nd half a bit.Well deserved Hammers. Poor defending at corners once again and shocking finishing by us. Bad Bamford tonight, had a couple of sitters. Mind you Hammers hit the woodwork three times. Starting Costs ahead of Harrison was a mistake and starting Roberts always is.
Another thing was how Hammers looked far more physically imposing than us.
What's wrong? It's the same part of the arm they used.
Exactly. So if it's handball then it shouldn't be offside.What's wrong? It's the same part of the arm they used.
So I don't see the problemYes and you should only be offside with a part of the body you can score with.
So I don't see the problem
Huh? It hit him below the t-shirt line... And below the t-shirt line is considered not part of your body for offside.Exactly. So if it's handball then it shouldn't be offside.
And vice versa.
Loonerty can fight his own battles.Same part of the body used to determine offside and handball?
I don't get what you mean.Huh? It hit him below the t-shirt line... And below the t-shirt line is considered not part of your body for offside.