- Sep 11, 2006
- 8,354
- 19,509
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Still haven’t reemployed that boot studder 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.

You didn't address the 4 other high % shots we missed in front of goal from a set shot. But no you're wrong, Hawkins has kicked insanly well from these positions all throughout the year, he wasn't even close to kicking them tonight, hell Robbie Grey won a game after the siren from the same position earlier in the year. But when there is a loose man back you take the entry at the boundary rather than a long bomb in to the loose man intercept all night long.
Whatever Scott says before the game, he should do the opposite.What ever Rohan does pre game for a final he should do the complete opposite
Realistically Duncan was no chance at all at 3 qtr time, he would have had to kick 57m-60m with everyone back on the goal line, that range is beyond Duncan
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
One thing I will say is that I can't understand why we went away from our game plan that seemed to serve us so well early/mid season. At that point I thought it was the first time I had seen a clear game plan from Scott and it was working. The slow it down, chip sideways, keepings off type of game plan. I haven't seen that for 6 weeks and I don't really understand why tbh. I might be reading it all wrong, but I can't work out why we wanted to play quickly when to me that slow play was working so well. It seemed that no-one could touch us when we played that way, but I haven't seen a lot of it since. Others on here are saying the slow play is what cost us, but I didn't see it tbh. I though we went way too quick and it didn't work for us.
Anyway, at least we've given ourselves a 2nd chance. I'm not confident at all, but who knows - we're still in it - just.
Na he marked it about the 52-53m markYou may be right. I haven't seen a replay of where he took the mark. I thought it was at 51m which would have been just within his range imo since he's a pretty long kick. But it may have been further out than that.
We have 3 first round picks already
Scott seems in denial. Said that it was a game that the "ball didn't bounce our way" or words to that effect. FFS.
His first two shots were on the boundary.
Yes, it's so frustrating see him in denial in his press conferences.Scott (in the presser) once again not facing the reality of his failed game plan...
You certainly cant drop Henderson after that game.
Scott seems in denial. Said that it was a game that the "ball didn't bounce our way" or words to that effect. FFS.
Tried to tell you that all week long.
In fact, there are may on here who can see it except the coaches. Bizarre.
Clark is the future. Play the boy. He hasn't even been poor in the games he has played either. It's different if he was a massive liability but he's got spark. Needs to play.
That's all he can say. He doesn't have any answers. If he did, we wouldn't lose 75% of the finals we play in.Scott seems in denial. Said that it was a game that the "ball didn't bounce our way" or words to that effect. FFS.
Are you seriously hanging it on Kolo's decision making and disposal in comparison to Henry's?Kolo is a poor decision maker with poor disposal. The opposition know this and and are happy for him to have ball in hand and then hit him with some pressure and he crumbles. He's not a bad shutdown player but he offers no drive out of defence, in fact he kills momentum more than any other player in the team.
Henry is raw and makes the odd mistake but at least he plays with some enterprise and is a far more athletic option than Kolo.