SOS is a dumb campaigner. **** off.
Thank you for your quality contribution. Your grandmother would be so proud.
Anyway, I'll be off your team board now. Good luck with Bryce. He really is a beauty of a player.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 9
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
SOS is a dumb campaigner. **** off.
Well carlton wanted to get us back for eddie betts and they sure ****** us. Surely Reid looking after an old client. Needs to go now.
Their second rounder could be has high as 20 next year.
10 and 16 for Gibbs/20
As much as not rating this years crop of draftees I think its c combination of the followingI guess we don't rate the players in the draft this year.
Gibbs is more likely to win us the flag next year than picking up two draftees now.
On paper not a great trade. But given we now have 3 picks i n the top 20 next year (assuming Carlton are bottom two) plus Gibbs, and are in a so called Premiership window, the outcome is not that bad.
Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
She's dead idiotThank you for your quality contribution. Your grandmother would be so proud.
Anyway, I'll be off your team board now. Good luck with Bryce. He really is a beauty of a player.
Not really. It's about a mid third round pick short on points.
Either way it is a poor outcome. Pick 10 plus is a VERY poor outcome.
So most likely it looks something like this;
ADE
OUT: Pick 10 (2017), Pick 16 (2017), Pick 30-35 (2018)
IN: Gibbs, Pick 20-25 (2018), Pick 36-40 (2018)
The 4th round picks mean nothing.
So effectively, ONE first round pick, ONE down grade of 4-9 picks (but in a stronger draft so effectively equal i.e. pick 16 2017 = pick 20-25 2018) and one down grade of 1- 5 picks (again stronger draft so actually an upgrade i.e. Pick 36-40 2018 > Pick 30-35 2017).
On the overall basis we are in fact giving up one first round pick. The rest of the deal balances out nicely.
Actually a pretty good deal.
Sanders being positive.... This feels so unnaturalThis deal is virtually #10 on its own
IF
And it’s an IF
We can get 12 for Cameron, that means we have more or less traded Cameron straight up for Gibbs
Let that sink in
Cameron & change for Gibbs
Unless I’m missing something I’d call that A+ for Reid
Yep, last year I thought it was. Very different situation after 2017. Have you even bothered to look at the trade as a whole, also taking into account a likely pick 12 for Charlie? It's basically a 2 pick downgrade, a loss of pick 16 this year, and an upgraded 2nd round pick in 2018 (where we already have two first round picks).I could say the same, at least my narrative has been consistent.
She's dead idiot
We should both be happy, they get pick 10, we got gibs and a 3rd selection in 2018 superdraft.Carlton fans dancing in the streets, that’s how fair it is . Can’t find one unhappy Carlton poster. Telling.
not too long ago you yourself were spruiking the fact that "next year's draft" is fools gold at the end of a rainbow.
2018 picks worth moreYou can’t on one hand start chest beating about how we got 2 first rounders for a 21 year old Jake Lever (which includes a first from this year’s “rubbish” draft) only to then turn around and say we robbed Carlton by giving them two firsts in this years draft.
Moving the goalposts to suit the argument.
Since we’ve apparently robbed Carlton, did Melbourne rob us by managing to offload their dud pick 10 in such a woeful draft?
I don't know. You brought her up.What does that have to do with anything?
Who's saying we robbed carlton?You can’t on one hand start chest beating about how we got 2 first rounders for a 21 year old Jake Lever (which includes a first from this year’s “rubbish” draft) only to then turn around and say we robbed Carlton by giving them two firsts in this years draft.
Moving the goalposts to suit the argument.
Since we’ve apparently robbed Carlton, did Melbourne rob us by managing to offload their dud pick 10 in such a woeful draft?
Cameron ?? You mean the guy who didn't turn up for most of those 24 weeks ?? Gov who didn't play for 10 of those either.
Feel good about it? Seems like the right move to me with high quality SA talent there.
You can’t on one hand start chest beating about how we got 2 first rounders for a 21 year old Jake Lever (which includes a first from this year’s “rubbish” draft) only to then turn around and say we robbed Carlton by giving them two firsts in this years draft.
Moving the goalposts to suit the argument.
Since we’ve apparently robbed Carlton, did Melbourne rob us by managing to offload their dud pick 10 in such a woeful draft?
So you're saying that hypothetically, if you were wrong in the past about fool's gold , this is a good deal now.What part of
“If draft quality is to be believed”
Did you find confusing?