Please discuss.
Scape Goat He tries his best, but Shane Tuck's critical errors.
- Thread starter bigpapagman
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jun 30, 2012
- 5,235
- 10,575
- AFL Club
- Richmond
He is might tip to fall out if the team come finals if Edwards, King, White and Newy come back.
Jimmybob
Spec Moderator
- May 26, 2012
- 4,726
- 8,066
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Heat, Tasmania
- Moderator
- #3
It's hard to come on the ground and be influential as a sub, he needs to be given a full game, though I suspect he's being kept fresh for the finals; his grunt and aggression will be very handy. The only error I saw was him missing the goal late in the last quarter.. you can't kick em all
sante
Emu
He's too slow. That's his problem now.
Your really going to use tuck as the scapegoat? He had a good impact as sub.
How about putting the burner on one of the many players who relaxed and let a five goal lead slip?
How about putting the burner on one of the many players who relaxed and let a five goal lead slip?
I think there was half the team worst than tuck and u pick on him? Please.
Look at our captain and Martin.
s**t thread.
Look at our captain and Martin.
s**t thread.
Tuck comes on when we have been outscored by +/-30 points in a quarter and a half and you think he is the problem?
He's not the greatest, but I think with him winning the ball for four quarters we would have stood a better chance.
He's not the greatest, but I think with him winning the ball for four quarters we would have stood a better chance.
- Apr 21, 2012
- 4,115
- 5,124
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Whoever's playing Carlton.
- Banned
- #8
Everybody was kicking like Tuck today. The problem was not everybody was going hard at the contest like him.
Hang on a sec. Tuck plays 40 mins get 16 disposals more than cotchin. Martin for the whole game and more than 3/4 of our team. Anyone who has an issue with him seriously have no idea about footy. I though he was good today
- Thread starter
- #11
Just not being quick enough at the end really stood out, for mine.
- Apr 21, 2012
- 4,115
- 5,124
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Whoever's playing Carlton.
- Banned
- #12
Judd obviously a liabilty for them now.
Garbage thread to post today. Looked the only one out there giving effort and winning the ball in the last quarter when our entire team was going at a walk. Discuss Tucky all you like but just not relevant today.
Is this a cunning plan to get activity on bigfooty?
Clearly seems a thread designed to get us to turn on each other.
No interest.
Clearly seems a thread designed to get us to turn on each other.
No interest.
Yet was probably BOG for us.
rideclutch
Norm Smith Medallist
Was hoping the prefix was supposed to be ironic or something, but I guess not 
.
.
Ridiculous thread.... Close please mods. People should be entitled to their opinions but this is absolute crap...
Wild Westiger
Cancelled
- Mar 14, 2013
- 565
- 1,227
- AFL Club
- Richmond
He made some mistakes, but didn't every Richmond player. And like every week he plays he has a red hot go, getting amongst it and getting the ball. Unlike one Tiger who it seems is chasing more money than he's worth. Now who could that be?
What a s**t thread.
He played a quarter and a bit and had the equal most clearances and 2nd most contested possession for the match.
Open your eyes. He should be starting every week if we're serious.
He played a quarter and a bit and had the equal most clearances and 2nd most contested possession for the match.
Open your eyes. He should be starting every week if we're serious.
What a load of rubbish. Tuck was on the ground for a 1/4 and did more than Martin, Grigg, Houli and Petterd. Our leaders went missing today. We needed more Tucks on the ground that bleed black and yellow than mercenaries, downhill skiers and players that couldn't get a game at Melbourne.
He was our best midfielder after Lids.
It makes NO sense putting him as the sub.
Why the hell would you have a first gamer run out the game, and Tuck who can play 120 minutes on the ball coming on as an impact player?
I thought Dimma was easing him into it when he was the sub against the swans, and I thought he was a strategic win when coming on when the rain hit against Hawks but there is no reason he should have been sub instead of Nahas and no way he should have been sub instead of McDonough.
I think that cost us the game today. Tuck came on and got 16 touches, McDonough played the whole game for 11 touches. Imagine Tuck's output over a whole game. I reckon we would have been at least two goals better off.
It makes NO sense putting him as the sub.
Why the hell would you have a first gamer run out the game, and Tuck who can play 120 minutes on the ball coming on as an impact player?
I thought Dimma was easing him into it when he was the sub against the swans, and I thought he was a strategic win when coming on when the rain hit against Hawks but there is no reason he should have been sub instead of Nahas and no way he should have been sub instead of McDonough.
I think that cost us the game today. Tuck came on and got 16 touches, McDonough played the whole game for 11 touches. Imagine Tuck's output over a whole game. I reckon we would have been at least two goals better off.
Conca Truck
Club Legend
I thought Tuck was good when coming on. He needs a full game for now on. Don't know why McDonough wasn't the sub.
Start I've been onto it all year .
Similar threads
