pastmyprimus
Norm Smith Medallist
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2011
- Posts
- 9,126
- Reaction score
- 33,597
- Location
- Back in the heartland
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I've heard Jonas hasn't been offered a contract, suggesting he could be traded.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 7
SuperCoach Rd 7 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 7 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Is that from an insiders view, ie you have spoken to insiders, or are you guessing that's how they think?? If you are guessing, then I don't know how relevant that comment is.I think you will find the coaching staff does actually see things like a lot of us do but are somewhat handcuffed by what they can say and do during season. Reason being it affects the value of players come off season - which in turn limits our ability to maximise our off season player movements.
its an opinion of mine... no more, no less.Is that from an insiders view, ie you have spoken to insiders, or are you guessing that's how they think?? If you are guessing, then I don't know how relevant that comment is.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Sigh, nobody wants to leaveFrom The Advertiser last month;
"Injured Port Adelaide defender Tom Jonas is ignoring opportunities around the AFL to seek a new deal at Alberton.
Jonas, 25, today confirmed he has sought a new contract at Port Adelaide — and does not want to be at any rival AFL club"
Isn't that a good thing?Sigh, nobody wants to leave
It really hasn't worked in our favour of lateIsn't that a good thing?
What do you mean? We offered some of them long term contracts, and they accepted because they were happy with the, and being at the, club. Dumb management by us, nothing to do with the happiness of players and their desire to stick around at the club.It really hasn't worked in our favour of late
REH does the contract of players have to be ratified by KT or others at board level? It just amazes me that we offered HH a 5 yr deal...I don't think I'm commenting based on hindsight but I just wonder what measures we have in place that scrutinises long term contracts.What do you mean? We offered some of them long term contracts, and they accepted because they were happy with the, and being at the, club. Dumb management by us, nothing to do with the happiness of players and their desire to stick around at the club.
I don't know about the board but I know KT signs off on it. He would pass it onto the board but I don't know if they would or could block it.REH does the contract of players have to be ratified by KT or others at board level? It just amazes me that we offered HH a 5 yr deal...I don't think I'm commenting based on hindsight but I just wonder what measures we have in place that scrutinises long term contracts.
REH does the contract of players have to be ratified by KT or others at board level? It just amazes me that we offered HH a 5 yr deal...I don't think I'm commenting based on hindsight but I just wonder what measures we have in place that scrutinises long term contracts.
Who is steel? A kid to be drafted or someone on a club's list?herald sun reporting we are interested in steel. We would love to get him, but saints are also interested. We have a higher draft pick them in each round though, of course we've got no second.
Who is steel? A kid to be drafted or someone on a club's list?
Is that Logan Austin's mate from ACT and the GWS academy?jack steel from gws, he was drafted in 2014
Yes. Want. He's been linked to st Kilda.Is that Logan Austin's mate from ACT and the GWS academy?
yehIs that Logan Austin's mate from ACT and the GWS academy?
Who is steel? A kid to be drafted or someone on a club's list?
Oh well Jack, if the mountain won't come to Muhammad..."I was pretty shattered when he went to Port, especially when I found out that the Giants would have taken Logan if they had the next pick, but we both ended up on an AFL list and you can't complain about that."
They used up all their picks with a Draft Index Value to trade/give away at the draft."I was pretty shattered when he went to Port, especially when I found out that the Giants would have taken Logan if they had the next pick, but we both ended up on an AFL list and you can't complain about that."
Doesn't make sense. I thought GWS could simply have nominated him as an academy selection. They then could have matched Ports bid. But they didn't and at best would have rookie listed him.
Funny stuff(begone HBFlankers 'r us),
