Dagless
Hall of Famer
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2007
- Posts
- 35,837
- Reaction score
- 11,576
- Location
- Not Scotland
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- GB Packers
Again, whats going to cause more outrage in an actual kitchen... An average to decent meal with a concept that isn't just 'home cooking', or a decent to good meal with key things missing off every plate?People need to think about this logically.
There is no way a food critic like Matt Preston - whose very profession relies on honesty and integrity - is going to compromise himself. If he did he would never be able to walk into a restaurant again and rate it without being accused of being biased.
Ditto Donna Hay. What possible interest does she have in compromising herself ?
Maybe, Julie's food just happened to taste better than Chris's. Incredible concept, I know.
Despite the fact that Chris has shown to be one of the best in the show (IMO) and even if he is a twat, to say its something as simple as 'the things on the plate tasted better and should no matter what get them through' is folly. Its obvious that they weighed in the initial ideas of the book beyond what they should have.
People can say 'oh it will get easier in the real world when they know what they are cooking', thats just crap, because you are under worse constraints to produce higher quality food (ie not just castard on top of pastry when someone orders a pie which is apparently passable as a pie in the MC kitchen)
Maybe I'll audition next year, crank the waterworks when they walk up to me. Pretty much ensures I will get through with only a passable ability in the kitchen










