That's an inexplicable claim
He was gifted (invested) games in year 1. Rightly so
In year 2 he was in the side on merit and showed some great signs in our first final
But he doesn't even have a position and he hasn't actually done very much on field. He's all about future development.
Lever is about what he will be on a thin cv so far but a lot of promise
Mitch is also about what he will be, based on what he already has done.
You want to keep both but if both are being targeted it's an easy call.
For Lever to have real value to be worth the hype he either needs to be a key defender. If he is just a 3rd tall he can still be great, but that means he needs to be Ben Hart or Boris Enright.
The likelihood of that seems remote to me. It's a high bar if he's not a key defender
He is an intercept marking, creative, 3rd tall defender. This is a very important role/position.