- Nov 14, 2010
- 42,206
- 46,445
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
The stats are speaking for themselves
I doubt another club will ever have a 3 year run as bad as we are having
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Would also be supportive of a temporary increase in the soft cap for North to go and head hunt as high quality assistant and line coaches as possible to help Noble (assuming you guys don't sack him).Would rather a couple of experienced players with mature heads/bodies, not another youngster to get tainted by the current situation the club is in
End of first won’t do much unless it’s coupled with another first round pickDespite being self-inflicted can't fathom having to watch another shitful North side for another 2 years. Approaching fold/relocate levels now (not that it will ever happen but the while they perform at this level the journos will keep banging on that drum).
I see an end of 1st round and some mature selections.
End of first won’t do much unless it’s coupled with another first round pick
Eg) mid first plus end of first
Age isn’t an issue either we were older than the freo team when we played each other
Even half of that would sufficeHave no issue if they receive similar compensation to that of Gold Coast 3 years ago.
They look in worse shape than Melbourne 2012-13.
Absolutely agree, get the structure right and give yourself an opportunity to properly build capability.Would also be supportive of a temporary increase in the soft cap for North to go and head hunt as high quality assistant and line coaches as possible to help Noble (assuming you guys don't sack him).
So this.More kids to throw into the meat grinder isn't really going to solve the competitiveness issue.
North need senior bodies and they need to sort out what's going on behind the scenes. Increasing soft cap spending for North will probably go a long way
Nah maybe next yearRegardless if 8 wins across 3 years doesn’t get you a start of first round at a min then nothing will
You might end up with 8 wins in 4 years the way its goingi work in facts
8 wins in 3 seasons
I look forward to teams in the future asking for one with a better win loss record over that period
Hence why I’m expecting more than 1 pp and at the very least mid first round if not start ofYou might end up with 8 wins in 4 years the way its going
You seem to be a sensible poster on this topic so i would like to ask you this questionThis is exactly this.
So as a league how do we engineer it that mature players that have actual ability for the now can help North in next couple of years be more stable whilst the young talent North already drafted develop together to impact games more?
Do we need to adjust the free agency system to make it more geared to help teams way down below? and if so, how do we do it?
Tom Lynch to Richmond when they were going well is probably not best for competition or what free agency was meant to lead to.
Swans years back got Lockett and Paul Roos to their club when they were s**t like this. That was well before free agency existed but in a way, worked for the time period of league then and what equalisation is meant to achieve. This is type of help North need now. A priority pick for talented 18 year actually does nothing in the now and just complicates things further and takes from another club down below that is early in the draft.
Have you been shooting up freddy?Essendon deserve one more than North Melbourne. North Melbourne beat west coast, Essendon couldn't, therefore North Melbourne are a better team and shouldn't receive a PP
Essendon deserve one more than North Melbourne. North Melbourne beat west coast, Essendon couldn't, therefore North Melbourne are a better team and shouldn't receive a PP
This could get uglyIf the dons want pick 1 in the draft, they just need to crank up the club sanctioned team wide doping program again and it’s all yours …
Agreed. Surely we can just tank repeatedly like Carlton? Has worked much better netting 0 premierships as opposed to 0 premierships for the doping program.This could get ugly
Carlton supporter advising how to get pick #1
Probably the later but I think because the 3 more development coaches means more attention to detail for all their youngsters to potentially develop more.You seem to be a sensible poster on this topic so i would like to ask you this question
which would assist north situation more in the net 3-4 years
get a PP pick say pick #19 or
Get extra 5 Rookie spots and $500k extra in their soft cap for 3 more development coaches