Preview Round 10 Preview/Changes vs Sydney (#IndigenousRound) [Wells/Wright in for Ray/Mullett]

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Champion Data's pressure factor is not easily accessed unless you want to pay big bucks. However you can Google the definitions and sides with 183 pressure factor and above win around 85% of games. It includes all sorts of acts that disrupt opposition ball movement, not just tackling eg force a player to kick without steadying.

It's fair to say that Essendon in their last quarter against us were able to steady for every single disposal but not Carlton last week when Dumont headed our pressure acts with 25 and Nahas was 4th with 18. On the other hand Ray had 10 and Mullet just 6.

A lot of supporters are just not interested in pressure acts or the team's pressure factor and deride them. They judge players purely on how many times they get it and what they do with it, which is important no doubt but if you don't apply pressure at AFL level, you will get slaughtered no matter what. The same supporters are then furious when the opposition move the ball with ease up the ground and then usually blame the back line when a goal is kicked. So those supporters do actually care about pressure, but they rarely factor it in to their selection opinions.

As much as I don't really like the Herald Sun, they do include individual pressure acts in their stats. I've watched them closely each week and our players who score highly don't get dropped the following week. Disrupting an opposition possession is as important as having a clean one yourself. Our ability to bring that each week - and our team is apparently ranked elite in this area after 9 rounds, is what is unsettling the opposition and what the coaching staff are focusing on every week.

Wells was topping pressure acts with about 24 a week until he rested. It's not fashionable, alot of fans don't give a rat's about it, but it's the first thing I look at now. Being at the ground you get a good sense of who is applying it but definitely not on TV. Champion Data have 2 guys just doing pressure stats for each game - you cannot just ball watch to pick it up.

So anyway, not surprised Nahas held his spot.

Our supporters say 'kick the ball forrrrrrwardddddddsssss not bacccccckwards Northhhhhhhh......."

Thats where it starts and ends.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Is anyone else pining for Faz Raz already?..With his LegoMan haircut and his workmanlike brand of run and carry he'd found a special place in my heart...
Sam Wright and Daniel Wells are great 'ins' but I will watch this game haunted by a sense of melancholy....So long Faz Raz.... good luck and god speed in the VFL....
5.gif
 
I reckon they will continue the Mitchell hard tag and I think it will be on Ziebs. Will be interesting to see how he handles it.

Good thing is he can drag him forward. Big game from Swallow and Cunners needed.
 
Is anyone else pining for Faz Raz already?..With his LegoMan haircut and his workmanlike brand of run and carry he'd found a special place in my heart...
Sam Wright and Daniel Wells are great 'ins' but I will watch this game haunted by a sense of melancholy....So long Faz Raz.... good luck and god speed in the VFL....
5.gif
There is definitely something unique about his kicking style - he runs, then looks like he's about to sit down in the final stride before he kicks it. Maybe it's his signature power move a la Tiger Woods.
 
I reckon they will continue the Mitchell hard tag and I think it will be on Ziebs. Will be interesting to see how he handles it.

Good thing is he can drag him forward. Big game from Swallow and Cunners needed.
The word on our board is the same, ziebull to cop the tag. Our Mitchell shut down hawk Mitchell very well last week, but he may not be the right person to tag Ziebull. Cunningham may get the job, or else they'll let Kennedy go man on man, which would be pretty interesting.
 
100% agree with you on the value of this and yeah, it's not easy to notice on TV. It's the art of closing down space quickly when needed, holding off and creating turnovers when they have nothing on, setting up to stifle and counterattacking. No surprise on Wells either.
Yeah, Wells is a defensive weapon alright.... Those chase down tackles are game changers.... He knows how to stay out of their peripheral vision... They never see him coming...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Majak flying up, I've read it could be goldy or brown out on another thread. Surely it's Petrie with all the neck specialists reports this week?
 
I reckon they will continue the Mitchell hard tag and I think it will be on Ziebs. Will be interesting to see how he handles it.

Good thing is he can drag him forward. Big game from Swallow and Cunners needed.
Sadly I reckon for old man Boomer if they continue with the hard tag it will go to him for the 1,484th time. Every team still sees a Boomer touch as potentially game over. Ziebell would be hard to tag, considering he's a such a bull. To be honest I can't recall him being tagged before.
 
Don't think you can tag Ziebell purely because he wins his own ball rather than relying on others, so hopefully Sydney try to.
 
Sadly I reckon for old man Boomer if they continue with the hard tag it will go to him for the 1,484th time. Every team still sees a Boomer touch as potentially game over. Ziebell would be hard to tag, considering he's a such a bull. To be honest I can't recall him being tagged before.
Harvey way to quick fo mitchell. Mitchell will go and find the ball rather than tag... that's my guess.
 
Champion Data's pressure factor is not easily accessed unless you want to pay big bucks. However you can Google the definitions and sides with 183 pressure factor and above win around 85% of games. It includes all sorts of acts that disrupt opposition ball movement, not just tackling eg force a player to kick without steadying.

It's fair to say that Essendon in their last quarter against us were able to steady for every single disposal but not Carlton last week when Dumont headed our pressure acts with 25 and Nahas was 4th with 18. On the other hand Ray had 10 and Mullet just 6.

A lot of supporters are just not interested in pressure acts or the team's pressure factor and deride them. They judge players purely on how many times they get it and what they do with it, which is important no doubt but if you don't apply pressure at AFL level, you will get slaughtered no matter what. The same supporters are then furious when the opposition move the ball with ease up the ground and then usually blame the back line when a goal is kicked. So those supporters do actually care about pressure, but they rarely factor it in to their selection opinions.

As much as I don't really like the Herald Sun, they do include individual pressure acts in their stats. I've watched them closely each week and our players who score highly don't get dropped the following week. Disrupting an opposition possession is as important as having a clean one yourself. Our ability to bring that each week - and our team is apparently ranked elite in this area after 9 rounds, is what is unsettling the opposition and what the coaching staff are focusing on every week.

Wells was topping pressure acts with about 24 a week until he rested. It's not fashionable, alot of fans don't give a rat's about it, but it's the first thing I look at now. Being at the ground you get a good sense of who is applying it but definitely not on TV. Champion Data have 2 guys just doing pressure stats for each game - you cannot just ball watch to pick it up.

So anyway, not surprised Nahas held his spot.

Thanks for this post. Made a lot of sense. Very enlightening. Appreciated it.
 
probly the week to put money on us for the Flag
We will do them, up there and set up a Top 2 result
We are much more even, they will freak out when we start smashing them around,
and their bottom 6 will panic and their old codgers are past it whereas ours are mostly playing better
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top