Scandal Stephen Dank charged by NT police

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

"Essendon players caught up in the infamous peptide saga are reportedly still considering further action to clear their names, arguing there has never been proof the 34 banned players were injected with the Thymosin beta-4 substance."

LOL, please let this be true, saga needs a good revival
Perhaps the players should ask the club why they destroyed the records that show what was injected into them.
Why would anyone destroys records that show the injections put into the players were legal?
Now in my opinion there is only one reason why you destroy records of what was injected into the players
 
What is strange is that Dank would be employed again by any agency involved in competitive sport. I find it weird that a teams administration would look at the Essendon 34 players the and surrounding storm that is still following the players and club today and say Geez I want a bit of that down here.

he wasnt?
 
What is strange is that Dank would be employed again by any agency involved in competitive sport. I find it weird that a teams administration would look at the Essendon 34 players the and surrounding storm that is still following the players and club today and say Geez I want a bit of that down here.

I suppose lawn bowls is a competitive sport..........;):cool:
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

According to CAS, they think he might have.

Yeah, not quite accurate is it?

According the CAS, they were comfortably satisfied that he did **

** There, you see that? Thats how you do accuracy. Anything less is fraudulent....much like Dank when you come to think about it.
 
Its not competitive enough to use perfermance enhancing drugs though is it?

Yeah I'm not so sure about. When you're hovering around the 80 mark, some of those old boilers can look pretty good I'm told. Especially if your glasses are a bit old. A little Viagra is supposed to be performance enhancing.....

Oh wait...enhancing lawn bowls....yeah sorry...my bad
 
Yeah, not quite accurate is it?

According the CAS, they were comfortably satisfied that he did **

** There, you see that? Thats how you do accuracy. Anything less is fraudulent....much like Dank when you come to think about it.
Accuracy my arse. They were comfortably satisfied thinking that he might have. What I said before.
 
Accuracy my arse. They were comfortably satisfied thinking that he might have. What I said before.

Hahaha No! That's not how it works.

The CAS must be comfortably satisfied that the alleged doping took place. If they thought that it might have, then they would have dismissed WADA's appeal.

You can spin this anyway that you wish but everybody, including yourself, knows that what you claim is a load of old cobblers.

Let me help you out here with a direct quote from the Arbitral ruling:

Para 151. For the above reasons:
(i) The majority of the Panel is comfortably satisfied that all players violated Clause 11.2 of the 2010 AFL Anti-Doping Code and were significantly at fault in so doing: and
(ii) one member of the Panel agrees with that conclusion save in the case of several players in respect of whom he is not comfortably satisfied that such use is made out
.

That is the actual decision. There is nothing about 'thinking it may have happened'. The written decisions is absolutely clear, the were comfortably satisfied that the players doped. So let's drop the bulldust, stop trying to pretend the decision was somehow unfair and stop trying to rewrite the facts. Especially, when you're not very good at rewriting the facts.

To put it more simply, NOT what you said
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top