Richo on 3AW today said Tigers don't have any replacement for Riewoldt so he will likely have to play on unless they bring in someone via the trade to help Lynch in 2024.
Ok isn't that interesting. Not only that but the 3 teams ranked 16 17 18 are the current bottom 3! There are a couple of exceptions but your ratings seem to have predicted the 7 years future ladder positions of teams fairly well.
So this is the youth of each club you are ranking at that point - players aged 23yo and below? And you were ranking them based on their output at AFL level in 2016 alone?
2017 would be very interesting but I would also be acutely interested in the earlier years say 2015, 2014, 2013 to see if they were useful predictors of performance 5, 6, 7 years in the future.
24yo and below.
If you read the OP:
"team finishing first in each category is awarded 18 points, second place gets 17 points, and so on, with the last position earning 1 point.
The five categories are:
Total Supercoach scores
Total Player Ratings
Average Supercoach scores
Average Player Ratings
Total Coaches Votes"
So three of those outputs are for single seasons (Coaches Votes, total SC scores, average SC scores), two are progressive from previous season and current (total player ratings, average player ratings).
If you read the OP you can see my rationale for doing this.
I can go as far back as 2012, so I'll post them all from 2012-2022 in one Google sheet.
Yes it's interesting the bottom 3 are the current bottom 3. I would say it's common sense that if you don't have good youth that eventually you'll slide back down the ladder in a equalised competition with salary caps and drafts.
This kind of rankings would have less sense in European soccer, were rich clubs can just buy their players without any cap to spending.
Others have answered above but I think it is fair to say without that priority pick(massive rort 2 years after appearing in b2b Grand Finals) Collingwood would have been a whole lot less likely to draft Pendlebury.
Meteoric Rise
Interesting excercise. I'll post some thoughts later but here is every one from 2012-22
Crows try a rebuild from the bottom up and get a 6 week ban based on some Port Power fan golfer whos txted photos to the age .... Which they never published with their story.... Because of some supposed unfair advantage..... pfftyeah thats a bit suss, pretty much might as well give WC a priot pick even though they won a GF recently. A few clubs got a good leg up during that era rebuilding.
Crows try a rebuild from the bottom up and get a 6 week ban based on some Port Power fan golfer whos txted photos to the age .... Which they never published with their story.... Because of some supposed unfair advantage..... pfft
Nah. The AFL is happy to kick some clubs while they are down. Colour me cynical.
On SM-G781B using BigFooty.com mobile app
I don't remember what happened with that, can you elaborate?
Do North need priority picks?
No, they're ranked 7th for youth.
What does finishing top 2 in the rankings mean?
It usually indicates that you'll win a Premiership or play in a Grand Final. Currently, Freo is ranked first and Hawthorn is second. Given Freo finished first in the rankings last year, their time should come soon. Thus, finishing second is especially significant for Hawthorn this year, as they've never finished in the top 2 before; then again neither has Sydney who are hot on their heels.
When are you going to start placing bets of these now rankings young Roby
Reiwoldt has been good every time I've seen him this year. Not at the peak of his powers Coleman medalist good but he's basically held that forward line together. He's still a solid player.Not sure Riewoldt can as he is a shadow of the player he once was. Richmond will just need to hope Lynch stays fit and also draft in a replacement and hope they are ready to replace Lynch in 2 years time.
Do North need priority picks?
No, they're ranked 7th for youth.
What does finishing top 2 in the rankings mean?
It usually indicates that you'll win a Premiership or play in a Grand Final. Currently, Freo is ranked first and Hawthorn is second. Given Freo finished first in the rankings last year, their time should come soon. Thus, finishing second is especially significant for Hawthorn this year, as they've never finished in the top 2 before; then again neither has Sydney who are hot on their heels.
CLUB | AVERAGE AGE | AVERAGE GAMES PLAYED |
---|---|---|
Adelaide | 25 years, 31 days | 88.3 games |
Brisbane | 26 years, 147 days | 128.3 games |
Carlton | 26 years, 89 days | 93.3 games |
Collingwood | 27 years, 174 days | 135 games |
Essendon | 24 years, 346 days | 84.4 games |
Fremantle | 24 years, 138 days | 74.3 games |
Geelong | 27 years, 45 days | 133.6 games |
Gold Coast | 26 years, 45 days | 102 games |
Greater Western Sydney | 26 years, 97 days | 104 games |
Hawthorn | 24 years, 120 days | 83.2 games |
Melbourne | 26 years, 196 days | 128.2 games |
North Melbourne | 24 years, 327 days | 98.1 games |
Port Adelaide | 24 years, 313 days | 87.7 games |
Richmond | 27 years, 16 days | 123 games |
St Kilda | 25 years, 288 days | 107.2 games |
Sydney | 25 years, 167 days | 107.2 games |
West Coast | 25 years, 179 days | 98.2 games |
Western Bulldogs | 26 years, 38 days | 114 games |
Love it Roby!
People s**t can the anchors but fail to realise we are a young team (second youngest in r22)
The reason we are young this long into a rebuild is the dearth of players that have left.
Unlike other teams the media put that on the club instead of championing for handouts.
Very excited about the back half of the decade
Love it Roby!
People s**t can the anchors but fail to realise we are a young team (second youngest in r22)
The reason we are young this long into a rebuild is the dearth of players that have left.
Unlike other teams the media put that on the club instead of championing for handouts.
Very excited about the back half of the decade
Join FREE and support Australia's favourite footy community.
We let you block other users :)