- Banned
- #3,301
MVP = Most Valuable player in the series... Take Iggy out and what GSW probably win in 7 ? Take LBJ out and its 4-0 every game decided by 20+.. Iggy was great but LBJ should have won Finals MVP.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A great supporting cast on top of the league MVP, defensive player of the year, current all star and a previous all star.
I left out the runner up part, my bad.Kawhi Leonard (assuming you are meaning Draymond)
D Wade averaged over 20 points in both the championship years, even with his injuries. Bosh averaged over 17 ppg in both the championship years and 7 rebounds. Both were all stars as well. Maybe not superstar material, but right up their with some of the top players.
GSW also had a great supporting cast. So did the Spurs in 2014. Shows that its the supporting cast who are the real catalysts in winning a title
MVP = Most Valuable player in the series... Take Iggy out and what GSW probably win in 7 ? Take LBJ out and its 4-0 every game decided by 20+.. Iggy was great but LBJ should have won Finals MVP.
http://espn.go.com/chalk/story/_/id/13096380/las-vegas-likes-cleveland-cavaliers-winner-2016-finals
Cavs hot favorites to win it next year. Surprised they are that short priced.
LeChokeLook at all these posters who we haven't seen once this year pop in to post tripe about LeBron after an amazing personal series...
See you again in 12 months time, peabrains.
Traditionally there has been a number of definitions for the MVP. One is "the best player on the winning team" which is clearly the definition with which they have decided to award it this year. Even this definition is a little tenuous given there was a fair discrepancy between the production of Curry and Iggy. In reality, the award is simply acknowledging a smart coaching move by Kerr.
Personally I prefer MVP to be defined as the player who is most valuable to his team. By that definition there was only one choice - the series would have been a sweep had you replaced LeBron with any other player in the league including this years' MVP.
So riddle me this then
Russell Westbrook MVP? Okc would have won ten games without him.
At what point do we put a caveat on losing?
The mvp hasn't come a less than 50 win team for a long time, the finals mvp from the losing team once.
It's no different to the brownlow, the norm Smith and basically every individual award given in any sport.
Cleveland take it to 7 then you have a case. Getting beat down in 3 consecutive games to finish in 6 takes the case away
So riddle me this then
Russell Westbrook MVP? Okc would have won ten games without him.
At what point do we put a caveat on losing?
The mvp hasn't come a less than 50 win team for a long time, the finals mvp from the losing team once.
It's no different to the brownlow, the norm Smith and basically every individual award given in any sport.
Cleveland take it to 7 then you have a case. Getting beat down in 3 consecutive games to finish in 6 takes the case away
Jerry west won it in a losing 7 game series that they lost by 2 points at home in game 7 and he had as good a series as lebron had here
So riddle me this then
Russell Westbrook MVP? Okc would have won ten games without him.
At what point do we put a caveat on losing?
The mvp hasn't come a less than 50 win team for a long time, the finals mvp from the losing team once.
It's no different to the brownlow, the norm Smith and basically every individual award given in any sport.
Cleveland take it to 7 then you have a case. Getting beat down in 3 consecutive games to finish in 6 takes the case away
Jerry west won it in a losing 7 game series that they lost by 2 points at home in game 7 and he had as good a series as lebron had here
Hell noThe simple question is, do you think Iggy played better in these finals than LeBron?
Hell no
I do understand why they gave it to a player in the winning team because that happens literally every time, especially when the series goes down the way this one did.
Personally, I'd probably have gone curry
That's exactly it.I get why they gave it to a guy on the winning team also, but it almost exposes them as having a caveat on the finals MVP being only available to a player on the winning team, but the name of the award insinuates everyone has a chance.
Picked Golden State as my NBA team in 1991 because Run TMC were just awesome, and they had the same colours as West Coast.
I also happened to travel through San Fran with my family as a kid in 1992 and got a Warriors cap to mark the occasion.
24 years is a long time to wait for a championship, but boy it was worth it! What an epic season!
LeChoke
He's just transferring his soccer board rubbish over hereNot sure if schoolboy or mentally challenged, but best you read up on the definition of choke.