Dogs_R_Us
Space Traveller
Deem schmeemIt is now deemed insensitive to talk about their weight.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Deem schmeemIt is now deemed insensitive to talk about their weight.
This feels like an actual example of that "woke madness" term.It is now deemed insensitive to talk about their weight.
Yep.Is this for real?
These are professional sportsmen, many of whom get paid more in a few years than most of us will see in a lifetime. Part of the deal is you have to put up with a lot of media exposure. The exposure pays their salaries (in a convoluted sort of way).
Se what happens when you put sticky labels on pieces of fruit! The world goes to sh*t.
IIRC it started from AFL players having their weights published but AFLW players not.Did this change come in because of Perkins in the AFLW? I remember she got slammed a lot, didn’t stop her kicking goals.
I would phrase it slightly differently. It's not insensitive to talk about their weight, but having that specific information available for public scrutiny is an unnecessary recipe for disaster.It is now deemed insensitive to talk about their weight.
I think it is extremely helpful especially as someone who follows the draft. Knowing how much muscle (weight) a player has put on over the pre Season for example is great to know.I would phrase it slightly differently. It's not insensitive to talk about their weight, but having that specific information available for public scrutiny is an unnecessary recipe for disaster.
Body dysmorphia and eating disorders are an enormous problem in the population, but particularly in athletes. It costs lives, and weight stigma, whether internal or external, is a disproportionately strong cause. This is not "woke madness," it's an attempt to save lives. May help, may not.
Personally I don't think knowing a player's weight is at all useful information for a supporter of a football club.
I think it is extremely helpful especially as someone who follows the draft. Knowing how much muscle (weight) a player has put on over the pre Season for example is great to know.
Sure, but weight change doesn't really tell you about muscle gain, you're extrapolating. For every player that is congratulated for putting on weight there's another that's criticised for it, and another that's criticised for not putting on enough.I think it is extremely helpful especially as someone who follows the draft. Knowing how much muscle (weight) a player has put on over the pre Season for example is great to know.
Just because nothing has been done about it doesn't make it a non-issue. The underlying issues I'm talking about are worldwide phenomena in athletes.It seems to be a non-issue in every other sport worldwide.
Just because nothing has been done about it doesn't make it a non-issue. The underlying issues I'm talking about are worldwide phenomena in athletes.
If Smith is 203 cm I really do need to go to Specsavers. The eye tells me he is under 200 particularly when you see him compete with opponents around similar height. Will take a stick and tape measure to the next Footscray game.It's a bit harder to find for players who are yet to debut.
There's footywire which has him at 203cm and 102kg
I was certain I saw him listed at 198cm somewhereIf Smith is 203 cm I really do need to go to Specsavers. The eye tells me he is under 200 particularly when you see him compete with opponents around similar height. Will take a stick and tape measure to the next Footscray game.
Pre draft he was listed at 198cm.I was certain I saw him listed at 198cm somewhere
If Smith is 203 cm I really do need to go to Specsavers. The eye tells me he is under 200 particularly when you see him compete with opponents around similar height. Will take a stick and tape measure to the next Footscray game.
I was certain I saw him listed at 198cm somewhere
Well we are just going to have to guess from now on by the look of it.Pre draft he was listed at 198cm.
It is only really a guide anyway at this point. Most players grow and shrink each year.Well we are just going to have to guess from now on by the look of it.
It is only really a guide anyway at this point. Most players grow and shrink each year.
FMD - only in Victoria or the ACT. Wokeism is still rife down your way. That rubbish peaked in a couple of years ago and we are recovering slowly up here in gods country.They're all guesses now. They're no longer going to be published due to body-shaming issues
Nope. It is relevant to know when judging how a player, such as a ruckman, will perform in physical contests.If you feel like you need to know a player's weight, and you don't work in the industry and therefore it's not relevant data for you to perform your job, then you need to get a life tbh.
He's not only undersized on pure height but also his vertical jump. Based on testing he is giving up 13cm-22cm against other rucks in his draft class in addition to 2cm-4cm of pure heights so he is absolutely going to be a a bash and crash type, hopefully in the Toby Nankervis mould.Smith looks roughly 199cms, undersized for a modern ruck so he'll have to focus on being a bash and crash guy.
Smith - Best performed ruck at Coates level for sure and as silly as it sounds, he's going to be an undersized ruck at AFL level. The reason guys like Green, Goad and Edwards went ahead of him is because they're taller and better at the tap ruck aspect. Smith will be a hustle and bustle, aggressive ruck, whereas the blokes who went ahead of him have much better ruck craft and will be good tap ruckmen. The numbers for comparison:
- Smith - 202cm, 72cm vertical
- Green - 204cm, 87cm vertical + easily longest arms in draft at 95.6cm (next best was 93.7cm)
- Goad - 206cm, 85cm vertical
- Edwards - 206cm, 94cm vertical