Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
When do they not crack the shits??!!!St Kilda supporters cracking the shits because they missed out.
Really? pink... oh cause they're girls... I get it.
Bit backwards imo
Or the AWFL.
That is an awfully inconvenient acronym.
the jumper with the pink V looks awesome.
Checked out the West Coast board and their stance on the whole women's AFL is quite disappointing. Don't seem to want to see it grow and are more concerned about whether the girls are butch lesbians or not.
Ok..I'm going to be "that guy"
How is this being financed?
The AFL is a non profit organisation that is formed to promote and run the sport in Australia. It will come from general revenue. There have already been sponsorships too. There is more than enough money to fund the thing. Football gets lots of public money too. Why should it be solely for the benefit of males to have playing football as a career choice?Ok..I'm going to be "that guy"
How is this being financed?
Not saying it looks bad. It does look good. It's more what it represents.
I know the colour pink has been empowered more of late in terms of its association with females. The pink ribbon campaign and other such things have put a more weight behind the colour, and a given it a certain maturity. But for me Pink means little girls, princesses and fairies and shouldn’t be marketed with women, especially for women’s footy. It’s limiting and sexist.
That sounds like more of a you problem.
Women's round & the few points you made celebrate women by using the colour pink. Having that pink chevron on the jumper certainly isn't sexist and I certainly didn't think that when I looked at it.
As for the pink it's a clever marketing ploy. The young girls will want the jumper with the pink in it. Mum's will be happier buying the "girls" one too. Capture them young and they become a supporter for life.
The AFL is a non profit organisation that is formed to promote and run the sport in Australia. It will come from general revenue. There have already been sponsorships too. There is more than enough money to fund the thing. Football gets lots of public money too. Why should it be solely for the benefit of males to have playing football as a career choice?
Looking at it from the other perspective, wouldn't you think they are looking at this as a way to make more money not cost more money? Otherwise why would they be doing it? We are excluding 50% of the population with a male only competition. Women's football is the fastest growing sport in Australia atm, surely that's a sign it can be a money spinner if set up correctly.That's fine, however the men's game finances the whole shebang...and I acknowledge that a start must be made somewhere before a women's comp can be viable.
We have clubs that are not financial already, and indeed Fremantle makes a profit of only 200-500k most years.
How's the club financing this team? Apparently, there will be shared facilities etc but you would assume that extra staff will be needed.
Where is Fremantle getting the money for this beyond the 1 million start up fund the AFL is giving?
IIRC the AFL actually reported a loss last year?
I don't think asking how a league is going to be financed and the effect on an already existing competition is outlandish commentary.
Looking at it from the other perspective, wouldn't you think they are looking at this as a way to make more money not cost more money? Otherwise why would they be doing it? We are excluding 50% of the population with a male only competition. Women's football is the fastest growing sport in Australia atm, surely that's a sign it can be a money spinner if set up correctly.
Yeah true. But if they weren't struggling then those Victorian powerhouse clubs would never be able to beat anyone I'm certainly a lot more positive about the women's league bringing in more than they are costing over the two franchise clubs. I can't believe GWS got a women's team. Surely it would be smarter if they waited until their men's team was financially viable first?You would hope so, however, half the men's clubs are loss makers....
Womens football is a big growth area in Western Sydney. The Giants have been much more active in promoting female football than the Swans as they see women as a huge untapped supported base. They also have the partnership with the UNSW through the NEAFL team.I can't believe GWS got a women's team. Surely it would be smarter if they waited until their men's team was financially viable first?
Yeah fair enough. So long as all the clubs are given equal support this time around it will hopefully play out fine.Womens football is a big growth area in Western Sydney. The Giants have been much more active in promoting female football than the Swans as they see women as a huge untapped supported base. They also have the partnership with the UNSW through the NEAFL team.
And Sydney dropped out and didn't bid.