Despite the evidence pointing to Selwood being the better player ... k.
He isn't a goose for thinking Selwood is a better player, that's debatable and fwiw I rate Selwood higher than Martin. He is a goose for letting his bias get in the way of a honest discussion about comparing Martin as a top mid, choosing to leave out that he is a 30 disposal 2 goal mid. Also for comments such as
Which he then follows up by lying about stats. I mean c'mon, that's classic goose behaviour.
Selwood averages way higher handballs, funny how DE is so high with thatWhy are you choosing to ignore your obvious errors instead electing to gloss back over the one statistic in which Martin has Selwood's measure?
And all this in less time on the ground.
- More disposals
- More tackles
- More goal assist
- More contested possessions
- More uncontested possessions
- Vastly better disposal efficiency - 75% > 55%
- More clearances
- Equal inside 50's
- More 1%ers
Let's give Martin;
Still pales in comparison 'goose.'
- More goals
If you want an adult conversation best you leaves the childish retorts behind.
Depends how you see it, I didn't think Fyfe was ever not the best in 2015, he just was injured and Dangerfield took his game to the next level. I see Danger as having to prove he is better than Fyfe this year which he may do, we just look at it differently. I don't quite think Danger has hit the form Fyfe had in 2015, but this year will tell us more. Good to see there is no longer a clear standout aka, Ablett 09-14
don't get distracted by Nakia's waffling, the comparison is to Dangerfield because them two are similar type players. Strong beasts who are explosive and can go forward and be dangerous. Selwood is a different kettle of fish, and happens to be one of the best wet weather players in the history of the game lol.
This continues to be your fall-back. Keep harping on about one meaningless statistic while glossing over the others which Selwood is comfortably superior, and that's despite not lying at all ... they were equal.
More excuses.
Silence Goose boy you've waffled on enough for one day, go take a nap.This continues to be your fall-back. Keep harping on about one meaningless statistic while glossing over the others which Selwood is comfortably superior, and that's despite not lying at all ... they were equal.
I'm not sure you're fit for these parts to be honest. Try Bay 13, that's more your style.
If we are going to include big bad Dustin Martin and the chopsticks saga which turned out to be a idiot trying to gain attention for herself, why don't we include Joel Selwood actually endangering people lives and costing his club a sponsorship as a result?
Then also complains if he feels others attack him.
the point being. Martin is nowhere near his peak and your writing him off
I've never seen a player have the speed, contested possessions, and ball skills combined as much as Ablett in his prime- the only thing stopping him from being complete was contested marking.
When did I ever write him off? I simply suggested that there were other midfielders that were better.
Wow. What a captivating statistic to know. I think Collingwood should sack him based on such a trivial piece of information.
If only people applied this logic with Treloar too.
You mean the same conditions as the other 43 players who had better efficiency??
Why are you so hung up about efficiency? You refuse to acknowledge how flawed the stat is. Dusty goes for high risk kicks. When he makes them, he opens the game up allowing us to score. When he doesn't we get an occasional turnover score against us.
