Chaisa
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- Jun 2, 2013
- Posts
- 15,233
- Reaction score
- 15,184
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- The Exers
This guy is so far past the d***head limit we'd need a new policy.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

This guy is so far past the d***head limit we'd need a new policy.
Brander is top 5. I rate him as a potential #1.
I think our first draft pick will be used on Brander if there or Coleman-Jones from S.A. Hope we get one of these 2.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Brander had a really good game against Vic Metro in the final round of the U18 Championships. He kicked a few goals and took a lot of contested marks. Until then he had been a bit underwhelming and been more chance to slide.
Also Cal Twomey has put out his first draft rankings. Around our likely pick seems to be mainly Victorian centre mids (Dow, Clark, Constable) and half back flankers (Coffield, Garner, Petruccelle).
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-07-06/callum-twomeys-phantom-form-guide-july-edition
Pick 4 for Reid would be outrageous.
Would be more in the mid to end of first round range.
It was something like pick 6-8 plus Mccarthy for pick 3Depends. Key Forwards have currency.
If Cam Mcarthy is worth pick 3, then Reid is worth pick 4.
Dixon went for a 1st and 2nd rnd pick.
If we recruit a free agent then I don't think we get anything for a free agent leaving.Picks 4 & 14 would be a fantastic return. Especially when we get Casbolt & Martin as free agents we'll be well in front.
Oh yeah that seems to be the caseIf we recruit a free agent then I don't think we get anything for a free agent leaving.
Makes sense, that would make it pretty easy to exploitIt was something like pick 6-8 plus Mccarthy for pick 3
How about Jacob Hopper?
A NSW boy who would become a Josh Kennedy replacement, such is his size.
http://www.afl.com.au/news/2017-07-12/numerous-clubs-circling-out-of-contract-giant-jacob-hopper
Yes it would but a 3 way trade would appease!It would be a cold day in hell when gws agree to trade us a talent like that.
I really would be annoyed if either of them left. We have put a heap of development into jones and he is just what we have needed for a long time : pace and foot skills. On top of that he is tough. It is notoriously difficult to get a good key forward outside the first round or even the top 10. Reid would be a massive loss. We would either have to play tippet and buddy together or turn one of our key defenders in the neafl into a forward if we did not recruit an immediate option. I believe they are both worth top ten picks but we usually bend over ever so slightly in trades, eg, there is no way Mitchell was not worth a top ten pick. If the club had any foresight hawthorns pick this year would be ours and as it stands that would of been fairer. Another recent example, Jetta for Sinclair. For those arguing he wants to go home and has us over a barrel forget it. I would of been happy for the club to say to Lewis, you're going to the draft. The difference would of only been Sinclair. It would have set a standard, regardless of the outcome. As it stands, because of these two trades, other teams would be right to think we are an easy target.
As an aside, in the event they both leave, I predict we will give away our first round pick and Sam Reid to Collingwood for their first rounder. I think Melbourne have a heap of inside midfielders but no pace in the middle. Jones will go for their first rounder. Another two reamings.
GWS don't need to worry about how other clubs improve. They have enough draft picks, speed and talent that they can leave everyone else in their dust. Strengthening the Swans with a mid who isn't breaking into their team would not worry the Giants.My point is gws will not strengthen us directly or indirectly.
It's not just other clubs watching what we do but also our own players. Showing respect to a player who wants to leave is good for morale of the group
No offence but I think that is a really soft argument. Is there any evidence of this occurring that you can think of?It's not just other clubs watching what we do but also our own players. Showing respect to a player who wants to leave is good for morale of the group
Don't agree. We are in direct competition in more ways than one.GWS don't need to worry about how other clubs improve. They have enough draft picks, speed and talent that they can leave everyone else in their dust. Strengthening the Swans with a mid who isn't breaking into their team would not worry the Giants.
I think this a key strength (and arguably also weakness) for our club.
We know we have to be happy to let players leave in order to ensure they are happy when they are drafted.
The days of drafting players who refuse to come (Rocca etc) were dark days.
So yes. We instill a good morale. But we also broadcast to the greater AFL community the message that our list is vulnerable.
Mitchell, Parker, Heeney, Hanners, Reid, Jones...That's a lot of quality players to be targeted in a short period. We're just lucky so many wanted to stay.
