Seriously doubt it.
What would be the point?
We're not taking the whole squad, so you're better off taking someone who might need to play if we have injuries.
I could be wrong but i swear i read we are taking the whole squad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seriously doubt it.
What would be the point?
We're not taking the whole squad, so you're better off taking someone who might need to play if we have injuries.
I'm pretty sure it's not the whole squad.I could be wrong but i swear i read we are taking the whole squad.
I'm pretty sure it's not the whole squad.
I've heard around 30 to 35.
Still, pointless taking him and a waste of money really.
Especially if he wanted to take the family.
Will clubs take their whole lists I wonder?Just posted the AFL rules in the hub thread.
No restrictions on players.
Will clubs take their whole lists I wonder?
I read that the SA teams are taking the whole playing group, but they’re going now and doing the mini-pre-season in Qld.
I'd guess we take our whole group minus Willie and DV - as they are both on the inactive list.
Why not (unless there is a reason a player can't go) - as if they are required say 3-weeks into the restart then they won't be able to join the hub or play games I would assume. Also match practice and fitness is going to be much better if all players train as a team.
Plus the AFL are footing the bill so why not take pets as well.
He won't get 12 months and if he did WADA would appeal it, would set a shocking precedent.The delayed season finalising later in the year suddenly makes his return viable this year if he is handed a 12 month ban.
He won't get 12 months and if he did WADA would appeal it, would set a shocking precedent.
Well thats one of the most emotional loads of rubbish I have read in a long time.
Not everything cones down to mental health, upbringing, community or any other socially engineered buzz word people want to lump in with this.
Yes the wait time is long and probably unnecessary but its no longer than anyone else has had to go through who has had to go through the same process..
Perhaps before he decided to break the rules and smoke cones and be a general smart alec in a serious situation he might have thought of the consequences but ultimately it was a selfish action so he can wait like everyone else.
His saving grace if he probably will end up with missing leas than a full season of footy.hardly a murder sentence
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
ASADA isn't a nation. They do not have judges, it isn't a trial, he isn't going to prison. It isn't a human rights issue.The right to a speedy trial is a basic human right. There is no doubt this is a failure of decency by ASADA no matter what Willie has done. Why this is acceoptable is completely beyond me?
The article mentions the possibility that there were other players in the room with Willie during his test.
If that is true, how does that stand with ASADA’s / WADA’s testing regulations?
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
ASADA isn't a nation. They do not have judges, it isn't a trial, he isn't going to prison. It isn't a human rights issue.
On moto g(6) plus using BigFooty.com mobile app