Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 97,455
- 236,071
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
- Moderator
- #4,944
A good reference point for picks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrighty on SEN just said we're not entertaining trading out Gunston or Breust.
He's rarely so categoric, so I take it as that door is closed.
And for now the speculation will rest on:Phew.
I guess their names will be floated around again this time next year, for the 7th year in a row.
ClickbaitCrawford suggesting teams will come after Wingard.
No way we trade him after what we gave up - JESUS
Crawf not the sharpest tool in the shed.Clickbait
Nightmare sounds better. Essentially Gunston + 3 for Raynor + 16. How about Bruest for Raynor, they get a player that helps them for the flag, we get a player with potential to fill Breusts role in the right age group.In the instance that we do actually get something coming back that we like, we may be interested in releasing Gunston who is contracted to 2022.
So, this one is for you Brishawk.
Gunston, Pick 3 and 21 to Lions for Pick 16, 19 and Raynor.
Dreaming?
I think that is reading too much in to it, i think what he says is exactly what he means.Is it just me who is reading that a little different? “Just cause we can get something in return” reads to me like they have already spoken to someone about them, and if your “speaking” then you are obviously open to it!
Nah, you've read way too much into that.Is it just me who is reading that a little different? “Just cause we can get something in return” reads to me like they have already spoken to someone about them, and if your “speaking” then you are obviously open to it!
Trade Breust!Phew.
I guess their names will be floated around again this time next year, for the 7th year in a row.
Totally agree with this. JOM and Tom have no upside.Im changing my thinking, Bruest/Gunners to stay. Shop both JOM, Mitch, they won't take us to success. If it means we take a step back to go forward so be it. Id even get off their contracts for a early second. Mids needs a major overhaul. Our fwds/backs would look completely different. No FWD in the comp would do well with Mitch/JOM/Shiels snapping it 15 m over their shoulder into the FWD 50 every time. Offer JOM for freo's first rounder, they might bite
Aiden Corr, 26yrs old key back worth a look fits the age profile and fills a list shortage
Fills a list shortage need that's true, I simply don't rate him though so I hope we stay away. TylerDurden says it's done to North anyways ?
Cue articles..."Stubborn Hawks Refuse to Face Rebuild Reality"
How can you suggest Mitchell has no upside? Still rebuilding from a season ending injury.Totally agree with this. JOM and Tom have no upside.
Not one team that has done a complete rebuild has won a trophy in the new era. Not going to happen we wont do thatWe sould be trading the following players to get more picks. We should have started our re-build 3 years ago.
Luke Breust - End of first rounder for the right buyer - Carlon, Geelong ??
Jack Gunston - End of first rounder for the right buyer - Geelong, Essendon
Chad Wingard - First rounder for the right buyer - Carlton
Isaac Smith (Free Agent) Potentually package Wingard and Smith for Carltons first pick.
Not one team that has done a complete rebuild has won a trophy in the new era. Not going to happen we wont do that
Exactly... how are the young kids going to develop in a Basket case side with no experienced leaders around themNot only do they not win a premiership, they become a basket case for 2 decades.
We need a mix of all things: 1st round talent, existing players, late pick success and trade gems.
If Gunston, Bruest, Smith and Wingard all left in the off season, we would finish bottom of the ladder with a percentage of 40, let's see how the young blokes develop playing in that team for 5 years. Absolutely putrid idea.