DeepThroat007
Team Captain
- Joined
- Jul 1, 2006
- Posts
- 391
- Reaction score
- 6
- AFL Club
- Richmond
No I'm not playing devils advocate. IMO Connors was poor yesterday and with Moore Thursfield coming back he would have to be under some pressure to hold his spot even though he had played well the previous 2 weeks.
Yes its about zoning and rebounding, but when your opponent has kicked 2 of the first 3 goals and 3 in the first quarter and a half you need to play man on man for a while and forget about kick chasing which is what Connors kept on trying to do. If he wants to truly become a very good player then he needs to realise that sometimes you need to sacrifice your natural game for the good of the team.
So as long as he gets 30 odd touches most weeks and gets torn a new one every know and then its ok and he doesn't need anymore development. Connors has been good in his rebounding role, my point is he'll be better when he learns when to go and when to stay and the sooner he learns that lesson the better.
i think we just agree to disagree, i think the two in bold will not not take his place, in actual fact it will enhance it, we are on the wrong page here, if it were 2 weeks ago with Thursty, Moore, Cotch and Jackson playing then id say yeah thats poor by connors if we got smashed and it was his man that he lost and had 3 goals kick early, but yesterday Delidio was tagged out of it, Newman has his hands full so where was the drive going to come from and the whole idea about Zoning is six Backs play regulary together to zone space and cover each others man and Connors, Newman,Delidio, Thursfeild, Moore Astbury and Farmer have done that well in the last 6 to 8 weeks, it was just to hard yesterday when the ball was like a flood in our defence.
i think we wait and see when the side is selected though i beleive Connors is safe.








