- Joined
- Jul 16, 2004
- Posts
- 12,214
- Reaction score
- 14,124
- Location
- Fremantle
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- DOCKERS
The obvious:
IN: Headland
OUT: Schofield
HFF for HFF. Very easy decision.
Next decision. Who to omit for Bell if he is fit.
. If Schammer is injured worse than expected than the decision becomes void.
On performance Medhurst would probably be omitted. But i doubt that CC would have the balls to mess with our forward structure in round 22 in a must win game for us to play finals. I think replacing Medhurst may be the right decision. Though even i, the keyboard selector omit him at risk of detrimenting our forward structure.
The question becomes which of our midfielders should be dropped. Walker has been playing the role of a small defender and i don't think he becomes part of the equation.
That leaves Peake, Crowley, Dodd, Schammer, Cook, Black, J.Carr, M.Carr, Hasleby as our midfield entourage.
Dodd has been excellent all year. The perfect tagger for the tall damaging midfielder. Played an excellent game last night and quelled Hayes completely.
Crowley similarly has been great as a tagger. I think his versatility as a forward pocket is the reason i think Medhurst should be dropped. Crowley, Headland and Farmer are all capable forward pockets and Crowley is also a capable midfielder.
Schammer isn't having an excellent year (compared with 2004, but has had an interrupted preseason and is close to his best), but has definately stepped up since the break. Returning to his home state he is likely to have a blinder.
Black has been exceptional all year. The Carrs are as hard as nails and Cook is harder.
Hasleby can be exceptional or ordinary (only because of injury). Given its an 8 day break i'm expecting exceptional.
Peake was excellent against the Saints, his runs through the middle of the ground was inspirational, this guy is quick. Exactly what our midfield has missed most of the year. I would hate to see him left out. After a 17 possession game including a goal would be tough to be omitted.
Thats a solid argument for every midfielder. I will suggest Cook's omission from the midfield. I realise this is blasphamy. But i feel that our in and under players of J.Carr, Hasleby and Bell are enough for the team.
The argument for Cook's inclusion is that he brings hardness to the team. I think all the players are playing with desire and hardness. His poor disposal last night cost the team a couple turnovers. I rate Cookie, but it seems he only excels in a losing team. The other possible omissions from the midfield list are Schammer, Crowley and Peake. All 3 in my mind have proved thier worth.
So my first choice for Bell's inclusion is Medhurst, 2nd choice Cook, 3rd/4th/5th Schammer, Crowley and Peake.
Don't be too harsh in your criticism of me
IN: Headland
OUT: Schofield
HFF for HFF. Very easy decision.
Next decision. Who to omit for Bell if he is fit.
On performance Medhurst would probably be omitted. But i doubt that CC would have the balls to mess with our forward structure in round 22 in a must win game for us to play finals. I think replacing Medhurst may be the right decision. Though even i, the keyboard selector omit him at risk of detrimenting our forward structure.
The question becomes which of our midfielders should be dropped. Walker has been playing the role of a small defender and i don't think he becomes part of the equation.
That leaves Peake, Crowley, Dodd, Schammer, Cook, Black, J.Carr, M.Carr, Hasleby as our midfield entourage.
Dodd has been excellent all year. The perfect tagger for the tall damaging midfielder. Played an excellent game last night and quelled Hayes completely.
Crowley similarly has been great as a tagger. I think his versatility as a forward pocket is the reason i think Medhurst should be dropped. Crowley, Headland and Farmer are all capable forward pockets and Crowley is also a capable midfielder.
Schammer isn't having an excellent year (compared with 2004, but has had an interrupted preseason and is close to his best), but has definately stepped up since the break. Returning to his home state he is likely to have a blinder.
Black has been exceptional all year. The Carrs are as hard as nails and Cook is harder.
Hasleby can be exceptional or ordinary (only because of injury). Given its an 8 day break i'm expecting exceptional.
Peake was excellent against the Saints, his runs through the middle of the ground was inspirational, this guy is quick. Exactly what our midfield has missed most of the year. I would hate to see him left out. After a 17 possession game including a goal would be tough to be omitted.
Thats a solid argument for every midfielder. I will suggest Cook's omission from the midfield. I realise this is blasphamy. But i feel that our in and under players of J.Carr, Hasleby and Bell are enough for the team.
The argument for Cook's inclusion is that he brings hardness to the team. I think all the players are playing with desire and hardness. His poor disposal last night cost the team a couple turnovers. I rate Cookie, but it seems he only excels in a losing team. The other possible omissions from the midfield list are Schammer, Crowley and Peake. All 3 in my mind have proved thier worth.
So my first choice for Bell's inclusion is Medhurst, 2nd choice Cook, 3rd/4th/5th Schammer, Crowley and Peake.
Don't be too harsh in your criticism of me





accountable when he trys to rebound out of defense. We stop him doing that and we win. He's been tearing it up in this role allowing C.Cornes to move up the ground.