GameofSloanes
Norm Smith Medallist
- Oct 20, 2015
- 8,611
- 13,824
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Liverpool, Glenelg
It's exactly why we laugh at DixonSo true. “Bringing the ball to ground” is a polite way of saying “drops marks”
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
It's exactly why we laugh at DixonSo true. “Bringing the ball to ground” is a polite way of saying “drops marks”
McLeod was just better than almost all other players in the league. Was absolutely robbed of a Brownlow in 2001 when he got no votes in a 37 possession game in Rd 22 and lost by 2 votes. Reckon he only got 1 for a 35 possession game a couple of rounds earlier vs North too. Even Aker admitted it.And here I was thinking Andrew McLeod was close to best on in our 2003 Pre-season Premiership win and certainly featured prominently in the whole series?
I must have been mistaken I guess.
But no on checking I wasn't...He actually won the Michael Tuck Medal for the M.V.P. of the 2003 Pre-season series..
The Colonel Sanders is usually pretty well up on these kind of things?
Michael Tuck Medal - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Wizard_Home_Loans_Cup
Oh dear muzza.. you dont research before commenting do you..And here I was thinking Andrew McLeod was close to best on in our 2003 Pre-season Premiership win and certainly featured prominently in the whole series?
I must have been mistaken I guess.
But no on checking I wasn't...He actually won the Michael Tuck Medal for the M.V.P. of the 2003 Pre-season series..
The Colonel Sanders is usually pretty well up on these kind of things?
Michael Tuck Medal - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Wizard_Home_Loans_Cup
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
#theadelaidewayEssendon playing all three of their 2020 top ten picks.
Meanwhile we're picking injured senior players and hoping they'll pass a fitness test.
Muzza as you call him has a bit of history at making bad calls, maybe you've noticed?Oh dear muzza.. you dont research before commenting so you..
I enjoy the comedy relief... Have Cornes or Rucci ever scrutinised the bloke or is that only reserved for when Tex has a poor game?It's exactly why we laugh at Dixon
McLeod was just better than almost all other players in the league. Was absolutely robbed of a Brownlow in 2001 when he got no votes in a 37 possession game in Rd 22 and lost by 2 votes. Reckon he only got 1 for a 35 possession game a couple of rounds earlier vs North too. Even Aker admitted it.
Got 0. Roo, Stevens and Perrie all kicked 5 and got all the Brownlow votes. Macca was robbedMcLeod was just better than almost all other players in the league. Was absolutely robbed of a Brownlow in 2001 when he got no votes in a 37 possession game in Rd 22 and lost by 2 votes. Reckon he only got 1 for a 35 possession game a couple of rounds earlier vs North too. Even Aker admitted it.
Nicks wouldn't have traded Greenwood ......he paid the price for some poor TPP decisions on other playerslook at the no.1 a guy we gave up for nothing, and then proceeded to draft his like for like replacement
not exactly a joined up approach
Greenwood, and to a lesser extent Keath (although the emergence of Butts helps soften the blow there), are the ones that shouldn't really have been let go, considering we weren't going to get anything close to fair value for eitherNicks wouldn't have traded Greenwood ......he paid the price for some poor TPP decisions on other players
Both were chasing Superannuation Contracts ......and given the rebuild, I understand why we were happy to move them on ......but Greenwood is exactly the type of mid we need, and has another 2-3 years in himGreenwood, and to a lesser extent Keath (although the emergence of Butts helps soften the blow there), are the ones that shouldn't really have been let go, considering we weren't going to get anything close to fair value for either
And here I was thinking Andrew McLeod was close to best on in our 2003 Pre-season Premiership win and certainly featured prominently in the whole series?
I must have been mistaken I guess.
But no on checking I wasn't...He actually won the Michael Tuck Medal for the M.V.P. of the 2003 Pre-season series..
The Colonel Sanders is usually pretty well up on these kind of things?
Michael Tuck Medal - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Wizard_Home_Loans_Cup
Both IMO will play well until the end of their contracts for their new clubs. Greenwood in particular is one of the key pieces to an admittedly sketchy Suns side, and Keath would slot straight into our current 22 (but would maybe not allow opportunity for guys like McAsey and Worrell in the coming weeks)Both were chasing Superannuation Contracts ......and given the rebuild, I understand why we were happy to move them on ......but Greenwood is exactly the type of mid we need, and has another 2-3 years in him
Mcleod played in 3 grand finals. 2x day & 1 night
best on ground in all 3. Now, that’s a big game player
Did the Crows offer him 3 years but he wanted 4? Or was it 2/3?Both were chasing Superannuation Contracts
Was chasing 4 years .....IIRC Gold Coast Contract is 3 years with an option for a 4thDid the Crows offer him 3 years but he wanted 4? Or was it 2/3?
I loved Greenwood, hoped he would stay. His effective mongrel makes McHenry look like a fool and the Crows miss his clean hands, extrication skills and tackling.
We offered 2 years and a low ball salaryDid the Crows offer him 3 years but he wanted 4? Or was it 2/3?
I loved Greenwood, hoped he would stay. His effective mongrel makes McHenry look like a fool and the Crows miss his clean hands, extrication skills and tackling.
Tbh the McGovern deal always looked pretty good. I know he was one of our X-Factor forwards, but we got more value from him than we got for Brouch hahahaThe best outcome more recently was McGovern. We would've kept him, but the result was significantly better than what he's delivered at Carlton.
Lever was a bad loss but we were compensated fairly.
We miss Charlie a lot.
Lever has taken a couple years to get going at Melbourne due to injury and formThe best outcome more recently was McGovern. We would've kept him, but the result was significantly better than what he's delivered at Carlton.
Lever was a bad loss but we were compensated fairly.
We miss Charlie a lot.