- Sep 6, 2011
- 14,845
- 23,696
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- AFL Member so technically all clubs
Gold Coast have 2 home games in Round 0/1 and they are favorites to win both.We'll be top of the ladder after round one, that much I'm confident about.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Gold Coast have 2 home games in Round 0/1 and they are favorites to win both.We'll be top of the ladder after round one, that much I'm confident about.
Bloody round 0 cheats!Gold Coast have 2 home games in Round 0/1 and they are favorites to win both.
just giving everyone else a chance to catch up before #17So 7,000 days without winning a final is finally enough?
Club X new sponsor?It’s the vibe man.
We have a different vibe atm…
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Random word generatorTouchy,touchy, me no hurty...castigation of the discombobulation you will be subjected to....
That’s all X’s and O’s stuff. All true, but there’s more too it than just that. Essendon have had a much better preseason and should (Doubt anything will change until the midfield steps up. The end of last year they were exposed and looked soft. Not sure how much of that has to do with the fact that our midfield is so small. Our best contested grunt player is Stringer who barely lasts 10 minutes in there. Parish gets the stats but he’s not the guy to break a tackle or rip the ball out of a pack.
Every single team who made the 8 last year has a 185cm+ midfielder who is a good contested ball winner and goes hard at the contest. Our closest to that is Setterfield. Many teams have multiple. Basically every good team has a player like this.
JDG, Dunkley, Trac/Oliver, Butters, Cripps, Steele/Crouch, Warner, Bont.
We do not have anybody on our list who has the attributes these guys have, or even potential. Tsatas is the only possibility but does not scream contest winner to me. Hobbs although a bit smaller, would be our best bet to succeed in this role.
I also don’t see any evidence to suggest that we will be successful with Parish and Merrett in the starting rotation.
) have a greater level of fitness and conditioning that should help them deeper in the season. It should also help them when they’re being challenged late (eg: ANZAC Day). Development and a more professional outfit appears much improved as well. So, things will change with these ‘global’ improvements to the team / club. At a granular level, it would be expected these areas will result in improvement of individuals, including the midfield as you point to.Did Bont play finals? Are Butters and Warner 185+ contested ball beasts? I agree with you but a few oddish calls hereEvery single team who made the 8 last year has a 185cm+ midfielder who is a good contested ball winner and goes hard at the contest. Our closest to that is Setterfield. Many teams have multiple. Basically every good team has a player like this.
JDG, Dunkley, Trac/Oliver, Butters, Cripps, Steele/Crouch, Warner, Bont.
We do not have anybody on our list who has the attributes these guys have, or even potential. Tsatas is the only possibility but does not scream contest winner to me. Hobbs although a bit smaller, would be our best bet to succeed in this role.
I also don’t see any evidence to suggest that we will be successful with Parish and Merrett in the starting rotation.
This is true, but the way the game is moving I'm not sure if that's the way to win a flag. Double down on your strengths and bring more run through the midfield.Doubt anything will change until the midfield steps up. The end of last year they were exposed and looked soft. Not sure how much of that has to do with the fact that our midfield is so small. Our best contested grunt player is Stringer who barely lasts 10 minutes in there. Parish gets the stats but he’s not the guy to break a tackle or rip the ball out of a pack.
Every single team who made the 8 last year has a 185cm+ midfielder who is a good contested ball winner and goes hard at the contest. Our closest to that is Setterfield. Many teams have multiple. Basically every good team has a player like this.
JDG, Dunkley, Trac/Oliver, Butters, Cripps, Steele/Crouch, Warner, Bont.
We do not have anybody on our list who has the attributes these guys have, or even potential. Tsatas is the only possibility but does not scream contest winner to me. Hobbs although a bit smaller, would be our best bet to succeed in this role.
I also don’t see any evidence to suggest that we will be successful with Parish and Merrett in the starting rotation.
Doubt anything will change until the midfield steps up. The end of last year they were exposed and looked soft. Not sure how much of that has to do with the fact that our midfield is so small. Our best contested grunt player is Stringer who barely lasts 10 minutes in there. Parish gets the stats but he’s not the guy to break a tackle or rip the ball out of a pack.
Every single team who made the 8 last year has a 185cm+ midfielder who is a good contested ball winner and goes hard at the contest. Our closest to that is Setterfield. Many teams have multiple. Basically every good team has a player like this.
JDG, Dunkley, Trac/Oliver, Butters, Cripps, Steele/Crouch, Warner, Bont.
We do not have anybody on our list who has the attributes these guys have, or even potential. Tsatas is the only possibility but does not scream contest winner to me. Hobbs although a bit smaller, would be our best bet to succeed in this role.
I also don’t see any evidence to suggest that we will be successful with Parish and Merrett in the starting rotation.
Port have Drew and Sydney have Rowbottom filling that role which allow the other contested players to thriveDid Bont play finals? Are Butters and Warner 185+ contested ball beasts? I agree with you but a few oddish calls here
This has been the problem for years.
No size and grunt in the engine room.
Adrian had his chance to dance when Dunkley nominated the dons, but he didn’t want to pay the band …
Yeah, Sydney have Parker as well, and Port have Drew/Wines/BoakPort have Drew and Sydney have Rowbottom filling that role which allow the other contested players to thrive
Why so funny Red Bull ? As a Carlton supporter you would be acutely aware of the improvement on field at Carlton that came from a lift in culture, professional standards, fitness and player development. It’s not that funny. When a club sorts itself out, the wins come.That’s all X’s and O’s stuff. All true, but there’s more too it than just that. Essendon have had a much better preseason and should () have a greater level of fitness and conditioning that should help them deeper in the season. It should also help them when they’re being challenged late (eg: ANZAC Day). Development and a more professional outfit appears much improved as well. So, things will change with these ‘global’ improvements to the team / club. At a granular level, it would be expected these areas will result in improvement of individuals, including the midfield as you point to.
that's one of our problems........one
and no, the Dunkley deal is as stupid now as it was then. Dunkley was not a fix to our issues, and not at the price required.
If Dunkley was the only missing piece, sure dive in, but our issues run far deeper than that and spending that much would just be silly.
Why so funny Red Bull ? As a Carlton supporter you would be acutely aware of the improvement on field at Carlton that came from a lift in culture, professional standards, fitness and player development. It’s not that funny. When a club sorts itself out, the wins come.
I’d rather have paid the price for Dunkley than Sheil …
Oh, ok. Seeing is believing, of course.The dons dominating in summer … again !!
Let’s see them stand up under fierce pressure in season.
Seeing will be believing …
what did u spend the assets on? which of them are best 23that's one of our problems........one
and no, the Dunkley deal is as stupid now as it was then. Dunkley was not a fix to our issues, and not at the price required.
If Dunkley was the only missing piece, sure dive in, but our issues run far deeper than that and spending that much would just be silly.
Dunkley deal for us would have been like needing to buy dinner for the whole week and spending all your money on a rib eye for Monday night!
reminds me of when they brought in shiel stringer and smith ... top up didnt do muchMatthew Lloyd 100% right today on radio.
They have topped up for the now. Its not about 2025,2026 or 2027. They must play finals this season.
I've currently got them 8th. The start to their season is a tough run. 5-4 would be a great result.
Oh, ok. Seeing is believing, of course.
However, we said the same about Carlton, then Brian Cook arrived and the club has straightened up, as you have seen first hand.
Seeing is believing. However, with Vozzo and Scott, a demonstrable change in standards and professionalism on the track, a much shorter injury list compared to years past, there’s reason for cautious optimism. Essendon will win finals in the next 100 years.
If progress continues in these areas I have listed above, winning finals will either be in 2024 (possible), or highly likely in 2025.
what did u spend the assets on? which of them are best 23