- Aug 9, 2019
- 32,464
- 56,480
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
I very, very highly doubt the Doggies will be putting pick 13 on the table in any way, shape or form, more likely to look at future picks or a player IMO
News Gone: Alex Keath wants to be traded to the Bulldogs
- Thread starter dogs105
- Start date
- Tagged users None
WeedsMullet84
Cancelled
- Oct 31, 2018
- 2,982
- 4,825
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Celtic, Glenelg
I don’t think Gary has factored in that neither player is a Free Agent, they’re just uncontracted, so a suitable trade has to happen.
It’s not in the best interest for anyone to send a player to the draft, but the Bulldogs have to offer a trade that reflects the contract on offer to Keath.
P13 for Keath and P28 should do it, P28 for Bruce. Bulldogs just trying to squeeze blood from a stone here
Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Fairly accurate assessments imo. Although, as others have said, if we send 23 back and get 13, he is valued in the 40s, which still matches this valuation.
If WB don't want to pony up, I don't see why we should trade him. His value to them is still the same. Keath can either re-sign with the deal we presented, or go play for GCS. Time to make a stand.
- Sep 5, 2017
- 1,973
- 4,144
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Would anyone do next years Dogs first for Keath and 28?
Id obviously be pushing for their 13 but it may be a good compromise and means we get to keep pick 23 instead of 28?
Might be able to on trade Dogs first next year to get back into this years draft.
Id obviously be pushing for their 13 but it may be a good compromise and means we get to keep pick 23 instead of 28?
Might be able to on trade Dogs first next year to get back into this years draft.
- Aug 9, 2019
- 32,464
- 56,480
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
Pretty clearly the Doggies have their eye on a player in the draft they assess as being available to them at their 1st round pick. Forget this points thing, Dogs don't need points this year. Too much emphasis is put on points, way too much unless you're a team that needs them.
Not mentioned that I can see, but Barrett, flog that he is, said this morning that injury talk pushed back the start date, not the trade value, and any talk of it doing so was 'posturing'.
How could this trade work without their first round? I feel we are very keen to be done with Keath, and if we had to would trade him for a pack of chips.
Is it true we offered a pick 21/ 28 with Keath and they have rejected this?
On Pixel 3 using BigFooty.com mobile app
How could this trade work without their first round? I feel we are very keen to be done with Keath, and if we had to would trade him for a pack of chips.
Is it true we offered a pick 21/ 28 with Keath and they have rejected this?
On Pixel 3 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Bulldogs are playing with fire here. Just do the deal *heads.
They need to give it up to get both Bruce and Keath.
No they don't is Bruce even leaving he is contracted, like Brad Crouch
WE shouldnt be concerning ourselves with Bruce, our concern is Keath Pick 32 will get it done and after the bullies have publicly declared 13 is not being traded that is what it will take
It won't be pick 32 for Keath.
Shaz2012
Cancelled
- Sep 15, 2012
- 7,928
- 8,424
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Yep. Gives us another first to play with if we want to get Luko. If we finish bottom 4 next year I don’t see why we should be giving that up for Luko if he hasn’t extended his contract. That becomes their bad luck. A late first is about right for a second year player who won’t have really set the league on fire at that stage.
Edit: Also might suit the dogs whose NGA will be going pick 1 anyway. They probably end up trading that out anyway. We could also give a wink, wink not to bid on him.
Bulldogs are trying it on but, we have the whiphand here.
We send him to the draft, he gets the money he wants and Bulldogs fail to fill a need.
They don't want him in the draft.
I agree, this might have to do. How keen are we, we did his surgery when we didn't think it was necessary??
On Pixel 3 using BigFooty.com mobile app
What's our 'whiphand'? Why would we send him to the draft? We don't want him.
On Pixel 3 using BigFooty.com mobile app
Bulldogs don't want him to go to the draft. They can avoid this, just gotta pay up.
- Moderator
- #494
Depends if your in a depressed market
Some outlay and a keen buyer you do it as an owner
- Aug 9, 2019
- 32,464
- 56,480
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
32 is about what I'm expecting we'll take unless a player is involved.
WaynesWorld19
Moderator
- Moderator
- #496
Crows looking for another low 1st round pick .....they only have Greenwood and Keath to use as chips to achieve that
- Aug 9, 2019
- 32,464
- 56,480
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Panthers, GWV Rebels, Central Augusta
Don't see it happening with the Doggies pick 13 personally.
- May 16, 2015
- 13,026
- 17,436
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- WWTFC,Chelsea,Glasgow Celtic,Lech Poznan
If the dogs are concerned about the injury and haggling then why don't they offer AK a lesser deal.
I would keep him personally if we cant get what we want.
I would keep him personally if we cant get what we want.
If they lower their offer, Keath might not be so inclined to move interstate.
If they are going to play games with him and us then lets give him a offer to stay as if don't get pick we want lets use him.
