I get that, but I still don't get why everyone is getting worked up over this incident, when the Mumford and Ablett scenario was exactly the same last year, and got barely any attention.Probably should've but 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I get that, but I still don't get why everyone is getting worked up over this incident, when the Mumford and Ablett scenario was exactly the same last year, and got barely any attention.Probably should've but 2 wrongs don't make a right.
Whether he intended to or didn't is not the point.
He slung Dangerfield to the ground while pinning his arm and concussed him. He got exactly what the rules say and what he deserved.
Suck it up and worry about your next match.
I wish this had of happened to hawthorn or Collingwood. Jeff or Eddie seem to be the most outspoken Presidents, not afraid to go on a rant.
They would also be more likely to take this s**t to court or assemble the other clubs to vote out this admin
Because the rules state "from a tackle" not "a mark"
I get that, but I still don't get why everyone is getting worked up over this incident, when the Mumford and Ablett scenario was exactly the same last year, and got barely any attention.
Cause Ablett had released the ball well before, and then Mumford swung him with force to the ground.
Trengove was in the act of swinging and Dangerfield still had the ball. He then got a fresh airy and didn't brace for the ground, and as usual he gets concussed.
he slung him. get over it.
I wish this had of happened to hawthorn or Collingwood. Jeff or Eddie seem to be the most outspoken Presidents, not afraid to go on a rant.
They would also be more likely to take this s**t to court or assemble the other clubs to vote out this admin
they've set the precedent
WTF?
Mumfords tackle was completely different to this one. and the intent was not to injure. **** you for even infering such a thing.
LOL. The *whole point* of the (heh) points system, is to NOT take precedent into acount.