grimlock
Hall of Famer
No one can give you that guarantee. Play well and he's a good chance of staying in but the Swans are well stocked in the back line. McVeigh also to come back.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would much rather try and mould Newman into McVeigh this year than bring McVeigh back. What would be the point? Bring him back so he can have a few games before he retires? I didn't rate Newman really but based on some of the things I saw last week he could very well be just as handy as an ageing, injury-prone McVeigh is.
You wouldn't know that he's only played two senior games
Fair to say we probably shouldn't drop him again?
He already has gone past McVeigh. Everything has gone past McVeigh. The game, his opponent and his contribution.I would much rather try and mould Newman into McVeigh this year than bring McVeigh back. What would be the point? Bring him back so he can have a few games before he retires? I didn't rate Newman really but based on some of the things I saw last week he could very well be just as handy as an ageing, injury-prone McVeigh is.
This conservative approach to not playing young players has cost us dearly in the past. He should have played in last years GF and we know who should not have. The fact that he was given no opportunities last year meant that it was always going to be very difficult to bring him into a first game GF. But he would have been a better contributor than a bloke who got 7 touches. Newman has been held back because of the overly cautious approach last year in playing young players. It was only the injuries this year that brought some of them in and they have all pretty much performed. Dawson is the one who is being restricted in his development by the conservative selection approach. Whats the point of having Dawson and Newman (last year) dominating in the NEAFL? The faceless men's selection approach is the same as the promotion ladder in the public service circa 1956Newman has just had one brilliant game, now he had to back it. Once he's doing that consistently he'll also need to work on being tagged. He's at least a season or two away from being the player we rely on
You miss-understood. We can't expect Newman to regularly have that sort of output because he hasn't proven he can regularly do it nor has he learned how to regularly have that sort of output. The Rampe of 2016 was miles ahead of the Rampe of 2014, not because we didn't try him but because he wasn't good enough. He was still learning and developing his own traits - the same with Newman. Saying we should now expect Newman to produce that sort of game week in week out is far too much expectation. Just check out LRT, he played a blinder against Port in his first season but didn't back it until much later. He only once reached the same heights - the 05 GFThis conservative approach to not playing young players has cost us dearly in the past. He should have played in last years GF and we know who should not have. The fact that he was given no opportunities last year meant that it was always going to be very difficult to bring him into a first game GF. But he would have been a better contributor than a bloke who got 7 touches. Newman has been held back because of the overly cautious approach last year in playing young players. It was only the injuries this year that brought some of them in and they have all pretty much performed. Dawson is the one who is being restricted in his development by the conservative selection approach. Whats the point of having Dawson and Newman (last year) dominating in the NEAFL? The faceless men's selection approach is the same as the promotion ladder in the public service circa 1956
He should have played in last years GF and we know who should not have. The fact that he was given no opportunities last year meant that it was always going to be very difficult to bring him into a first game GF.
Can u LTI a bloke week before GF and fit him in tho?Very hard for Newman to play senior football, let alone a first game GF when he wasn't even on the senior list at any point last season.
omgNo one can give you that guarantee. Play well and he's a good chance of staying in but the Swans are well stocked in the back line. McVeigh also to come back.
Yes well that is my point. "The fact that he was given no opportunities last year" Thanks for the clarificationVery hard for Newman to play senior football, let alone a first game GF when he wasn't even on the senior list at any point last season.
Can u LTI a bloke week before GF and fit him in tho?
Thanks for that. I didn't misunderstand anything. He was recruited as a mature aged player from the VFL. A much stronger competition than the NEAFL. He dominated that weak competition. He should have been played last year. He wasted much of his time last year in the NEAFL. Why do you reckon as a "first year" player he can come in and get 35 possessions which I believe is a record? He dominated the NEAFL GF last year and was obviously a player playing above that standard. Two of the selections for the GF contributed to costing us the game. But if you want to believe the self justification crap that comes from Longmire all the best to you and I have a bridge I can let go pretty cheaplyYou miss-understood. We can't expect Newman to regularly have that sort of output because he hasn't proven he can regularly do it nor has he learned how to regularly have that sort of output. The Rampe of 2016 was miles ahead of the Rampe of 2014, not because we didn't try him but because he wasn't good enough. He was still learning and developing his own traits - the same with Newman. Saying we should now expect Newman to produce that sort of game week in week out is far too much expectation. Just check out LRT, he played a blinder against Port in his first season but didn't back it until much later. He only once reached the same heights - the 05 GF