Interesting ... My Great Grandmother was a Gerrard.. Often wondered if Steven Gerrard was related to me.Just watched the first half of Rangers V Celtic.Bein Sports 2.Imo the greatest rivalry in World Sport.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 10
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Interesting ... My Great Grandmother was a Gerrard.. Often wondered if Steven Gerrard was related to me.Just watched the first half of Rangers V Celtic.Bein Sports 2.Imo the greatest rivalry in World Sport.
I know he's from up that way.You can do one of the searches.Rangers played out of there skins tonight.Good lessen for Port in Showdowns.íf all players can fire in the one game like V West Coast.Interesting ... My Great Grandmother was a Gerrard.. Often wondered if Steven Gerrard was related to me.
FFS the crows are 3rd.
I know they lost last week, but I absolutely love the positive attitude and energy that Richmond's fringe and young players bring. They thrive on the challenge of adversity and thus perform above levels expected of them accordingly. With their outs and two men down for most the game, they had no right to be winning so comfortably over here yesterday. Yet it shows what a positive approach to the game that genuinely permeates right throughout the organisation (as opposed to a hollow statement) can bring. I don't understand why we have an environment where our players go back into their shell so quickly when even internally we see the kind of football we can play when there's belief and confidence.
Richmond are still a very good chance this year I feel. Cotchin, Martin, Lynch & Grimes are absolute stars. Around them you've now got the likes of Baker, Bolton, Balta and Stack bringing confidence and aggression, with the underappreciated guys Broad, Astbury, Castagna and co. forming the glue. There's limitations sure, but I don't see any other club right now with the capability of playing such inspired bursts of footy. Geelong are obviously the pacesetters and look very strong this year all over the park, but these force of nature efforts typify finals footy.
Yeah I still rate Richmond a chance this year.I know they lost last week, but I absolutely love the positive attitude and energy that Richmond's fringe and young players bring. They thrive on the challenge of adversity and thus perform above levels expected of them accordingly. With their outs and two men down for most the game, they had no right to be winning so comfortably over here yesterday. Yet it shows what a positive approach to the game that genuinely permeates right throughout the organisation (as opposed to a hollow statement) can bring. I don't understand why we have an environment where our players go back into their shell so quickly when even internally we see the kind of football we can play when there's belief and confidence.
Richmond are still a very good chance this year I feel. Cotchin, Martin, Lynch & Grimes are absolute stars. Around them you've now got the likes of Baker, Bolton, Balta and Stack bringing confidence and aggression, with the underappreciated guys Broad, Astbury, Castagna and co. forming the glue. There's limitations sure, but I don't see any other club right now with the capability of playing such inspired bursts of footy. Geelong are obviously the pacesetters and look very strong this year all over the park, but these force of nature efforts typify finals footy.
Didn't they tick this off with the umpires? So what's the please explain for Gil? Please explain.Rampe has received a please explain letter from AFL. I would love to see the wording
Will they accept a simple 5 word reply - I had a brain fade?
If not, what is the punishment?
Rampe has received a please explain letter from AFL. I would love to see the wording
Will they accept a simple 5 word reply - I had a brain fade?
If not, what is the punishment?
Gilligan said it was OK not the umpires department. Technically correct process but no commonsense.Didn't they tick this off with the umpires? So what's the please explain for Gil? Please explain.
If it is not a free kick, and therefore not against the rules, what does he have to explain? They ticked if off as okay, so his response should be 'I dont have to explain anything as you told the world it was fine'.Rampe has received a please explain letter from AFL. I would love to see the wording
Will they accept a simple 5 word reply - I had a brain fade?
If not, what is the punishment?
Still begs the question why Gil is asking for a please explain when we already know he's said it's okayGilligan said it was OK not the umpires department. Technically correct process but no commonsense.
Gill isn't asking, the umpires boss is. It's like the COO is asking for a clarification despite the CEO''s statement.Still begs the question why Gil is asking for a please explain when we already know he's said it's okay
Pressure needs to be applied towards Gillon now.
The game is going backwards big time. It's becoming largely unwatchable for a neutral supporter.
Didn't watch the game yesterday, but saw on the news that Ablett's in elbow trouble again?
Pressure needs to be applied towards Gillon now.
The game is going backwards big time. It's becoming largely unwatchable for a neutral supporter.
Becareful what you wish for.OK Ken, learn from the best and get to it.
The management is horrendous but the game being unwatchable isn't on Gillon. That's on the clubs and coaches.
As Leigh Matthews said about Adam Goodes all those years ago when he hit Matt Thomas, Brownlow medalists are protected species.Neither Fyfe nor Ablett charged. Nothing like trying to preserve TV ratings for the Brownlow night I suppose. If Jonas had been reported in two successive weeks he'd have been deregistered.
This competition sucks. That elbow was worse than last week too. heck off AFLNeither Fyfe nor Ablett charged. Nothing like trying to preserve TV ratings for the Brownlow night I suppose. If Jonas had been reported in two successive weeks he'd have been deregistered.