Mega Thread Port Forum 'General AFL Talk' Thread Part 11
- Thread starter elpirate
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
I asked the umps and they said it was technically correct.
D. Rampe
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
- Nov 6, 2014
- 61,030
- 75,153
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I heard that the rule is you are not allowed to intentionally shake the post while your feet are touching the ground.
chachi11
Hinkley - 13 years of Pus incoming.
This is a rule I can see Gill implementing
Yeah looked that way on replay. Just like the umpiring recently, the MRO seems rather inconsistent. I just hope it isn't favouritism or working to a pre-determined outcome.
philreich
TheBrownDog
- Mar 2, 2014
- 58,691
- 147,793
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Ablett could be charged with gross indecency, and the judge would let him off on a technicality because it was only his 143rd offence. He's basically untouchable.
Butters Made Me Do It
Drinking tea
They're afraid GAJ will talk to his Dad and have them sent to hell too
https://www.theage.com.au/sport/afl...-over-mother-s-day-crowd-20190513-p51mvc.html
Lol. Hawthorn should never have a game against a non Victorian team. It makes them look bad and isn't fair.
Never mind Ports getting rostered home games Sunday afternoon for every long weekend across the season for years on end then mocked for tarps.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
Lol. Hawthorn should never have a game against a non Victorian team. It makes them look bad and isn't fair.
Never mind Ports getting rostered home games Sunday afternoon for every long weekend across the season for years on end then mocked for tarps.
Sent from my Pixel 2 XL using Tapatalk
https://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/s...s/news-story/5fb1568154fdc324345fd7e4e6e5b5da
Days after the AFL gave the all clear to a controversial non-decision on Friday night, Sydney Swans defender Dane Rampe has been charged with conduct unbecoming for climbing the goalpost.
But on Saturday, AFL boss Gillon McLachlan stood by the umpiring decision.
“I’ll wait and see what the footy department says, but for me it seems pretty practical umpiring,” McLachlan told SEN.
But now it seems that the AFL have changed their stance and, as reported by The Herald Sun’s chief football writer Mark Robinson, charged Rampe for the act.
Days after the AFL gave the all clear to a controversial non-decision on Friday night, Sydney Swans defender Dane Rampe has been charged with conduct unbecoming for climbing the goalpost.
But on Saturday, AFL boss Gillon McLachlan stood by the umpiring decision.
“I’ll wait and see what the footy department says, but for me it seems pretty practical umpiring,” McLachlan told SEN.
But now it seems that the AFL have changed their stance and, as reported by The Herald Sun’s chief football writer Mark Robinson, charged Rampe for the act.
- Jan 20, 2015
- 2,582
- 4,824
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Hilariously, two incidents where players hit people in the head with a raised elbow were let off, but the one incident that was a fair, low bump but a head clash resulted in concussion is the one that is penalised. So basically Durdin is being penalised for being unlucky, while Ablett and Fyfe get off for dirty, but lucky hits due to no injury to the player involved.
- Jul 5, 2013
- 7,074
- 13,497
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
McLachlan came out with a premature response, got news of the backlash and then probably went to a few AFL coaches for their opinion over some coffee
- Nov 6, 2014
- 61,030
- 75,153
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Christian must be embarrassed by his decisions constantly being turned over when stars are involved so he has given up.
Durdin getting a week is wrong. I expect that will get appealed as well.
That's a ****weak cop-out considering Hinkley, Voss and Basset have all achieved considerable success throughout their experience in the game. And then you've got Lade and Kingsley on Richmond's coaching panel who not all that long ago were a part of our group....
Agree with that. Am utterly staggered Fyfe got off though, that looked absolutely terrible.
- Nov 6, 2014
- 61,030
- 75,153
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
My heart bleeds for them
- Jul 5, 2013
- 7,074
- 13,497
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Lol Basil you muppet
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jdeezy
Premiership Player
- Jul 6, 2013
- 4,379
- 11,537
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
We're also fairly certain it was them and/or Collingwood that made the last minute fixture request that saw Hawthorn v Collingwood moved to Friday night in place of the hyped Friday night Showdown later in the year, right? Oh poor Hawks. So sad
- Nov 6, 2014
- 61,030
- 75,153
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
I ******* hate the arrogant self entitlement of that club. I wish them nothing but failure going forward.
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
Had a rethink about Rampe and the shaking of the goal post issue.
17.11 SHAKING GOAL POST OR BEHIND POST 17.11.1 Free Kicks - Shaking Goal Post or Behind Post Unless Law 17.11.3 applies, a Free Kick shall be awarded against a Player or Official who intentionally shakes a goal or behind post (either before or after a Player has disposed of the football).
The more I think about that, the more I reckon Rampe has a case of not intentionally shaking a goal post. Trying to climbing the goal post isn't intentionally shaking the post. Shaking a goal post is a reportable offence
21.2 REPORTABLE OFFENCES
.....
21.2.2 Specific Offences Any of the following types of conduct is a Reportable Offence:
(a) intentionally or carelessly;
..................
(z) intentionally shaking a goal or behind post;
So if Rampe was intentionally shaking the goal post, he had to get reported as well as give away a free kick.
So if this ended up at the tribunal, Rampe's QC would argue how is trying to climb a goal post to get an advantage to some how touch a ball going thru for a goal, intentionally shaking the post?
These are some eamples of intentional shaking of the post not just climbing it. From a 2014 article of 10 bizarre reasons for going to the tribunal
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/...l/news-story/7f4ee887fa0d4870cdbbcfe326e0385f
4. GOAL POST SHAKING
Six players, including Essendon’s Dustin Fletcher (fined $600), former Saint Stewart Loewe (fined $1000) and former Lion Darren Wheildon (fined $600), have been charged with the unusual offence of goal post shaking. Wheildon was dumbfounded when he was reported in 1993 after shaking the post while a teammate was shooting for goal. His coach Robert Shaw laughed: “He’s come up with another one, ‘Doc’. It was either going to be the 60-metre drop kick goal at the 29-minute mark or a report for shaking the goal post. I wasn’t sure which one. But God bless him, he’s an entertainer.”
And in 2018 the rule was 15.9.1. Plenty of new rules added since last year.
17.11 SHAKING GOAL POST OR BEHIND POST 17.11.1 Free Kicks - Shaking Goal Post or Behind Post Unless Law 17.11.3 applies, a Free Kick shall be awarded against a Player or Official who intentionally shakes a goal or behind post (either before or after a Player has disposed of the football).
The more I think about that, the more I reckon Rampe has a case of not intentionally shaking a goal post. Trying to climbing the goal post isn't intentionally shaking the post. Shaking a goal post is a reportable offence
21.2 REPORTABLE OFFENCES
.....
21.2.2 Specific Offences Any of the following types of conduct is a Reportable Offence:
(a) intentionally or carelessly;
..................
(z) intentionally shaking a goal or behind post;
So if Rampe was intentionally shaking the goal post, he had to get reported as well as give away a free kick.
So if this ended up at the tribunal, Rampe's QC would argue how is trying to climb a goal post to get an advantage to some how touch a ball going thru for a goal, intentionally shaking the post?
These are some eamples of intentional shaking of the post not just climbing it. From a 2014 article of 10 bizarre reasons for going to the tribunal
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/...l/news-story/7f4ee887fa0d4870cdbbcfe326e0385f
4. GOAL POST SHAKING
Six players, including Essendon’s Dustin Fletcher (fined $600), former Saint Stewart Loewe (fined $1000) and former Lion Darren Wheildon (fined $600), have been charged with the unusual offence of goal post shaking. Wheildon was dumbfounded when he was reported in 1993 after shaking the post while a teammate was shooting for goal. His coach Robert Shaw laughed: “He’s come up with another one, ‘Doc’. It was either going to be the 60-metre drop kick goal at the 29-minute mark or a report for shaking the goal post. I wasn’t sure which one. But God bless him, he’s an entertainer.”
And in 2018 the rule was 15.9.1. Plenty of new rules added since last year.
RussellEbertHandball
Flick pass expert
This has got to be on tape.
https://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/2015-05-27/the-story-so-far-dustin-fletcher
22nd July 2001 – After the Bombers come from 69 points behind to beat the Kangaroos, Fletcher is fined $600 for shaking the goal post.
https://www.essendonfc.com.au/news/2015-05-27/the-story-so-far-dustin-fletcher
22nd July 2001 – After the Bombers come from 69 points behind to beat the Kangaroos, Fletcher is fined $600 for shaking the goal post.
Richmond were a joke of a side that made finals only to lose the Elimination Final when Lade was there and then there was the really pathetic 2016 season. Lade left to go to Port in 2017. Richmond won the flag in 2017.
Appeal on what grounds though?
There was clearly high contact in the bump, so he can't get that wiped out.
He was rated as careless. So he can't get it downgraded fight that to get the offence down graded.
And the clash of heads took Gary Rohan out of the game, so he's not going to be able to argue its low impact.
- Status
Similar threads
