RandB
Brownlow Medallist
- Sep 9, 2007
- 16,630
- 12,822
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- MUFC Norwood
Son of Phil?Dawes needs to play an absolute blinder. And by that I mean he needs to blind someone.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Son of Phil?Dawes needs to play an absolute blinder. And by that I mean he needs to blind someone.
I also think that on numerous occasions on the weekend we were left with Jeffy as the sole long target deep inside 50. Whilst he's ok 1v1 its much more advantageous to have a Hogan or Dawes going one out.I do like the ins, but GWS strength is their midfield. I feel by dropping 2 players who are quick and can run through the middle, for only 1 mid and a tall, leaves us vulnerable for pace. JKH was quite good last week. I just feel we have 1 too many talls against a side who rely on their mids to get the job done.
Agree it's a danger, but I think it should be OK if they use the interchange to make sure there's a tall on the bench the whole match i.e. no more than three tall forwards at any one time.I do like the ins, but GWS strength is their midfield. I feel by dropping 2 players who are quick and can run through the middle, for only 1 mid and a tall, leaves us vulnerable for pace. JKH was quite good last week. I just feel we have 1 too many talls against a side who rely on their mids to get the job done.
I do like the ins, but GWS strength is their midfield. I feel by dropping 2 players who are quick and can run through the middle, for only 1 mid and a tall, leaves us vulnerable for pace. JKH was quite good last week. I just feel we have 1 too many talls against a side who rely on their mids to get the job done.
Really good to add another experienced body, plus he joins the list of midfielders that can kick some goals along with Jones, Tyson, Newton, Vanders, and Lumumba (if you want to count him as a mid)Bernie coming in is going to be crucial. One of the few players that had a crack last time we played GWS, also adds the threat of roosting a big goal from outside 50 if the Giants are too conservative trying to man up on Dawes and Hogan deep.
I'd have Cross tag Griffen - played together at the Dogs, so Cross would have a fair idea how Griffen plays. Viney onto Treloar.My biggest worry about GWS is Griffin. Regularly tore us apart at the Dogs and could do so again this week. I'd have Viney tag him rather than Treloar/Ward etc.
No point tagging ward , plays too inside I say let jones go head to head with him
Viney should tag Scully and treat him like Ablett, not because it will help us win but because **** tom Scully
Scully would play better if had someone like Viney showing where to run to.No point tagging ward , plays too inside I say let jones go head to head with him
Viney should tag Scully and treat him like Ablett, not because it will help us win but because **** tom Scully
Well then let's have Hogan tag Scully and have him treat him like Viney treated AblettScully got us Hogan, he's forgiven.
So is this game not on TV at all? I can't find it until a replay on fox at 1.30am
Might be on Fox Sports 3.So is this game not on TV at all? I can't find it until a replay on fox at 1.30am
So... Do we address the last time we played the giants or do we just consign that one to history and move on?
I'm still seething from that game - one of the worst experiences if had attending the footy in my life
Agree. That was revolting.So... Do we address the last time we played the giants or do we just consign that one to history and move on?
I'm still seething from that game - one of the worst experiences if had attending the footy in my life
I think we do this for every 'last time we met.' Except for the GC, Radelaide and the Drug Cheats.So... Do we address the last time we played the giants or do we just consign that one to history and move on?
I'm still seething from that game - one of the worst experiences if had attending the footy in my life