bomberclifford
Importer/Exporter
The fact Ransom gets pilloried in this thread and no-one else does is pretty obviously ageist and sexist.
I'm guessing that any criticism of Gavin W is racist too?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The fact Ransom gets pilloried in this thread and no-one else does is pretty obviously ageist and sexist.
All I know is that Cardone's conflict of interest is ridiculous and untenable.
Can you do this for all the other board members? I'm not going to pretend I know if Holly is good at her job, or indeed if any of the other board members are. All I know is that Cardone's conflict of interest is ridiculous and untenable.
The fact Ransom gets pilloried in this thread and no-one else does is pretty obviously ageist and sexist.
THE COURAGE ZONE ... "Things that are difficult"
lol
Cos Cardone has been pilloried in this thread and others, as has Koch, as has Amanda Vanstone. They like Holly have a public profile and have a bit of look at me, look what I have done, here is my opinion about things, so they become a natural target, especially when things aren't going perfectly.Can you do this for all the other board members? I'm not going to pretend I know if Holly is good at her job, or indeed if any of the other board members are. All I know is that Cardone's conflict of interest is ridiculous and untenable.
The fact Ransom gets pilloried in this thread and no-one else does is pretty obviously ageist and sexist.
I have been both the CEO and Principal Consultant of a one person consultancy. You shall all bow down before me and not question any of my opinions.
The other directors don't have a public profile and unless you know them, they are pretty invisible to the average member and fan, but that's the way most board members of most organisations are.
I want to play in the comfort zone please, seems much more peaceful
The definition of a consultant, "a person that knows one hundred ways to make love but has never had a partner".
Of course I've read those threads. Haven't read about his perceived incompetence on zero evidence in those same threads however.Yes? Have you missed the entire threads devoted to this topic?
I've got no idea how old you are and don't GAS .Cardone gets pillored, Vanstone used to get pillored.
You're correct that we don't really know what any of the board members actually contribute but to say that questioning of Holly's worth to the board is pretty obviously ageist and sexist is way off the mark. She is the board member with the most nebulous credentials. Can't the contribution of young pretty things be questioned?
You're disagreeing with any of my opinions is pretty obviously ageist though.
She has done well for herself, there is no doubting that.
Questioning her value as a PAFC board member is neither misogynistic or ageist.
I'd actually challenge you to outline what it is that Holly does and how it has benefitted the club during her tenure. What are the skills she brings to the table? I'd seriously like to know.
Her own website is full of the type of language used by personal development 'gurus' that is intentionally vague and non-specific. She's in the same ballpark as Tony Robbins (at the top end) and Lucy Bloom (at the other end) where the hype doesn't match the reality.
As I said, I'm open to all sorts of disruptive thinking on management and leadership, I read a lot of content on this stuff as it's part what I do, but I have yet read anything of Holly's that isn't loose ideas from the zeitgeist that have been hobbled together to present herself as a Disruption/Leadership wunderkind.
Chairmen and CEOs have sufficient exposed form to us plebs for some judgement to be passed. Cardone's been flogged, but only for a real COI, not for his capabilities.Tons of board members and prospective board members have come in for criticism at various times in the past, as have our Chairmen and CEOās.
Ransom has always faced greater scrutiny as an outsider (West Coast fan), who was handpicked by a razzledazzle Chairman, and whose entire track-record seems to be about making stuffy old white men feel good about themselves at low-risk by ticking inclusivity and corporate modernity boxes.
Did you know she had a chat with Obama?!
Of course I've read those threads. Haven't read about his perceived incompetence on zero evidence in those same threads however.
Nah, I'm following well. My post was about people questioning Holly's capabilities. I noted Cardone's conflict. And CEOs and chairmen clearly are not equivalent to other board members.You don't seem to be able to follow a conversation thread very well. You were suggesting that Holly Ransom is the only board member whose value is being questioned, which is clearly false.
Besides, I don't think any one has accused her of being incompetent. More that her contribution is unclear and that her skillsets are either not being utlised, or perhaps not even valuable to a football club.
Perhaps Holly Ransom actually deserves her spot on our Board. As a West Coast barracker, she's clearly not going to be here as a member of the cheer-squad.
THE COURAGE ZONE ... "Things that are difficult"
lol