domin8
Club Legend
DeludedYou must of been a Carlton supporter
Getting all the draft picks in the world whilst thinking premierships only to realise its not draft picks that win flags
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Collingwood v Melbourne - 3:20PM Mon
Squiggle tips Pies at 52% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
EUFA EURO 2024 - Group Stage ⚽ EPL 24/25 starts Aug 17
DeludedYou must of been a Carlton supporter
Getting all the draft picks in the world whilst thinking premierships only to realise its not draft picks that win flags
The 2mp / Van Rooyen players were discussed hereI would've got 2m Peter for a fourth round pick end of 2020 and selected Jacob Van Nistleroy over Tom Brown. Our KPF would be bulging with talent. Lynch, Riewoldt and 2m Peter would all be getting regular games off and playing 80% game time with Pete pinch hitting in the ruck. Soldo, Graham would've been cashed in when valuable and Ralph Smith would've been bundled with something for Hopper to have retained the 1st rounder. Club royally fu@ked our KPF stocks.
I hardly watch opposition games let alone the lower levels anymore. The club's reluctance to play any of Biggie, Bauer or Bradtke helping Jack tells me they're delusionally fantasizing about Jack and the 5 dwarves so I'm interested to see their plan. Don't have any real ideas myself. But my old 2m Peter and Van Rooyen were golden ideas.
I mentioned it to him!This reporter is clearly reading my posts
You 2 a thing now ?I mentioned it to him!
You must of been a Carlton supporter
Getting all the draft picks in the world whilst thinking premierships only to realise its not draft picks that win flags
The things I wanna know are:
- I know it's been harped on about (especially by me sorry), but why did we not draft Van Rooyen when we clearly needed Key Forwards?
- Why did Essendon get to trade absolute peanuts for 2-metre-Peter and Weideman, but we didn't seemingly try to get either? Wright I guess I can understand, he wasn't a real need at the time, but Weideman would have been handy. Maybe he has surprised a few, has been decent but everyone thought he was s**t. Just surprised we didn't get linked to him at all.
It's all three, we have big deficiencies everywhere now.because we need mids and the forwards where not there.
Did anyone think Van Rooyen could play better than he has from his draft credentials??
who is to say Gibcus will not be better anyway. plus we have a great tall ruck forward prospect in Ryan
Right now our problem is our backline and midfield, not our forwards.
This is why Richo never won a premiership at RFC, the backline was never respected. We should have got Pavlich
It's all three, we have big deficiencies everywhere now.
Ample? Have to disagree sorry.Nope, we have ample forward options, and ample small forwards, and ample rucks
Ample? Have to disagree sorry.
We have personnel, yes, do we have any that you're looking forward to getting a game? I'd argue not.
Weideman, the guy that now plays for the bummers?? You’re kidding if you think he’s any good, at all! Have a mate who follows the Dees and he is a huge critic, and from what I’ve seen to date, I agree with him. No thanksThe things I wanna know are:
- I know it's been harped on about (especially by me sorry), but why did we not draft Van Rooyen when we clearly needed Key Forwards?
- Why did Essendon get to trade absolute peanuts for 2-metre-Peter and Weideman, but we didn't seemingly try to get either? Wright I guess I can understand, he wasn't a real need at the time, but Weideman would have been handy. Maybe he has surprised a few, has been decent but everyone thought he was s**t. Just surprised we didn't get linked to him at all.
Weideman, the guy that now plays for the bummers?? You’re kidding if you think he’s any good, at all! Have a mate who follows the Dees and he is a huge critic, and from what I’ve seen to date, I agree with him. No thanks
And why didn’t we draft Van Rooyen? Answer is we likely didn’t rate him, along with most other clubs that had picks anead of us. So easy to criticise the Brown selection over VR, but Brown has been unluckily injured just about the whole time he’s been on our list and as such, hasn’t been able to show what he’s got. I’m not sold on VR at this point, does some good things but doesn’t look a star to date imo
Also, Van Rooyen is a West Australian. We have a very food track record of western australian recruiting over the years. Rance, McIntosh, Bolton, Pickett, Baker, Broad etc.
If our recruiter from there didn't rate JVR enough to fight for us to take him, I'd be inclined to back it.
NO !!! I dont value draft picks like you doYou must of been a Carlton supporter.
Getting all the trade for players in the world whilst thinking premierships only to realise it is not trades that win flags. aka Graham, Pickett
Carlton do not trade for draft picks.
They did not draft Judd remember, they drafted Kennedy and gave him up
NO !!! I dont value draft picks like you do
Magic Beans
Let me know when we miss out on a top 3 pick that could get us the next Dusty , Cotchinagree, I rate Cotch, Rance, JR, Dusty and others clearly more than you
timmy t was a pick 2 to
I was/have been very supportive of the Prestia, Hopper and Tarantino trades, but I don't see any benefits for the HH recruitment.The posters saying no to HH are probs the ones who said no to Prestia ( pick ), said no to Lynch ( money ) and said no to Taranto and Hopper ( picks ) They will always say no because they are posters who are obsessed with picks and drafting.
Also they are posters who would prefer to load up the side with sixteen 22 and unders and develop for 7 years picking up 1st rounders along the way for that one year at glory and then start all over again.
Posters who's season starts in October as that's what excites them more, the actual season is all about draft picks and a loss is never frowned upon ( even though they pretend it does by acting all outraged ) as it's a step closer to a better pick. Trade period is all about seeing who Richmond off load in that quest for a pick, spending a pick to bring a player in oh the horror, how could Richmond do such a stupid thing because all you ever read is them bemoaning the fact that picks were given away right up until draft night.
Saying no to HH who would slot in next to Lynch and allow Ryan to continue to develop next to Nank where he will eventually take over is shortsighted IMO.
And finally, any poster who says they wouldn't be against trading out Dusty because it would bring in a high pick is not a true Richmond fan because no true Richmond fan would ever say this.
Out of curiosity what about HH dont you support ?I was/have been very supportive of the Prestia, Hopper and Tarantino trades, but I don't see any benefits for the HH recruitment.
Out of curiosity what about HH dont you support ?
If his $$$ was $500k - would you support it ?
Is it his talent that you dont rate ? Why
Let me know when we miss out on a top 3 pick that could get us the next Dusty , Cotchin
Rance & JR were later picks
Mr Magic Beans