Bnf votes are for best on ground each game are they not? I doubt it would be unusual for a role player that the coaches value to not get any votes, those are being taken by the top 10 players on the list as a general rule, with the lower ranked players getting votes in outlier games where they had a blinder by their usual standards. So I’m not sure you will feature more highly if you’re just playing your role well tbh, rather than having a stand out game.
Edit: for clarity, I’m not arguing WHE should be in the 22. He’s not listed in the one I posted earlier. I think that he’s on the way to being pushed out with the new additions and the talented kids coming through, but I’m just saying that what he brought to the table the last few years was obviously valued by the coaching staff given he was never dropped.
You get points just for playing. Then based on how the coaches saw you filled the specific role given and metrics you get more points.
That's why there is sometimes a disparity between say the punters list of top 12 players for the years and coaches votes.
I think whe will continue to get games as I'm not sure there is a replacement ready better then him atm. The argument I guess is development player vs more games into a known commodity.