Zoom
Carefree
- Dec 16, 2018
- 3,314
- 8,571
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Chelsea FC
- Banned
- #1,151
Well we watch him week in, week out so we back our judgment in as opposed to relying on meaningless buzz stats like yourself. Even CD know pressure acts are flawed which is why it has been a work in progress for nearly ten years. If they perfect it then I will take notice of it, but it’s virtually impossible as pressure acts are often too ambiguous to interpret. That’s what you’re struggling to comprehend.Why are you talking about pressure points and ratings? That isn’t what I referenced.
Pressure acts are just that, acts where a player applies pressure.
If he wasn’t applying pressure, he would be like Jack and ranked at 22 for pressure acts at Richmond
I don’t give a sh1t about trying to give a rating of pressure by intensity or velocity or sneakiness of each pressure act which is apparently the specialist area of the Richmond bigfooty fan.
Good on you and the Richmond crew for having decided that Caddy’s pressure isn’t ‘intense’ enough for you.
Quite funny how you are happy to point out flaws and inconsistencies with a group paid to capture stats, but think a group of Tiger bigfooty fans are the best people to consistently validate how ‘intense’ pressure is!!
And to be honest I’ve kind of just been glancing over your drivel tonight. I understood your original point and I had my say on it. You’ve made it clear that you don’t watch footy and you’re a stat merchant so I don’t think there’s much more substance to add to this conversation, especially from your end lol.