Wow he's that crap that 4-5 clubs are interested...4-5 clubs interested.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wow he's that crap that 4-5 clubs are interested...4-5 clubs interested.
You're still old, that's your fault,With the special almost “Father and Son” relationship between the coach and Armo, still a fair chance #20 runs out again this weekend.
Changes?
That's why i think he's struggling too much on his mind with FA he is still in our best 22.Wow he's that crap that 4-5 clubs are interested...
Meant Young. Hind obviously played in TownsvilleThanks for that , so you think Hind should stay at Sandy next week
dont understand your hate for Kent ... bit like your hate for Clint Jones back in the day i find it puzzling .. there were certainly players not performing their role worst than Kent who should be on the block moreMy preferred changes (I know there's zero chance of it happening)
Out: Newnes, Kent, Armitage
In: Hannebery, Paton, Carlisle
B: Marsh, Brown, McKenzie
HB: Savage, Wilkie, Battle
C: Hannebery, Ross, Billings
HF: Sinclair, Bruce, Paton
F: Parker, Carlisle, Membrey
Foll: Marshall, Gresham, Acres
Int: Dunstan, Clark, White, Hind
Leave Carlisle as a deep option for the entire game - we saw a limping Brandon White get the footy in dangerous positions just because he was forced to play deep. Carlisle could do serious damage in that role and would give us so much more structure going forward. Brown stays in to take one of Hipwood/McStay/Smith. For the love of god please just give Acres a full game in the middle. Mids to rotate through the forward line instead of persisting with small forwards who aren't up to it.
No worries ,i just never know with you if your taking the P155 or being seriousMeant Young. Hind obviously played in Townsville
Parker goes way before Kent does , Lets hope Parker doesnt turn out to be a flash in the panIf you go through the various threads, various people want :
White, Brown, Bruce, McKenzie , Parker, Sinclair , Armitage, Newnes, Clark, Kent, Dunstan and Acres dropped.
On Kent, why, when we were struggling to kick goals, would we drop someone who kicked 2?
Sinclair could do with a kick in the butt as much as Newnes TBO , for a bloke that plays part mid - wing -half forward he doesnt get it enoughIf you go through the various threads, various people want :
White, Brown, Bruce, McKenzie , Parker, Sinclair , Armitage, Newnes, Clark, Kent, Dunstan and Acres dropped.
On Kent, why, when we were struggling to kick goals, would we drop someone who kicked 2?
Sinclair could do with a kick in the butt as much as Newnes TBO , for a bloke that plays part mid - wing -half forward he doesnt get it enough
Sinclair could do with a bit more consistency but I would give him a leave pass this week because IMO his possession in the last minute of the game was instrumental in us having a "W" against our name. Also we don't know what his role is from week to week. Some weeks his role might not allow him to get a lot of possessions.Sinclair could do with a kick in the butt as much as Newnes TBO , for a bloke that plays part mid - wing -half forward he doesnt get it enough
personally dropping him would be exactly that ... the guy looks to run on the positive reinforcement dropping him i reckon would do more harm than good long term... thats not to say he isnt above being dropped but i think you need to weigh up the pro's and cons of dropping him.. if there is a player beating down the door to take his spot then yeah , if he stops doing the non-negotiables of the team then yeah, if he is not bringing the pressure and the chase then yeah...Parker goes way before Kent does , Lets hope Parker doesnt turn out to be a flash in the pan
i agree i think Sinc is often tasked with roles that perhaps sacrifice his game for the sake of the team .. to us dumdum fans in the crowd we would look at it thinking hes not performing but internally he may be holding his role exactly as what is being asked of him ...Sinclair could do with a bit more consistency but I would give him a leave pass this week because IMO his possession in the last minute of the game was instrumental in us having a "W" against our name. Also we don't know what his role is from week to week. Some weeks his role might not allow him to get a lot of possessions.
Well Weller got picked up by RichmondWow he's that crap that 4-5 clubs are interested...
Oh shut up...Well Weller got picked up by Richmond
Apart from Kent and Membrey, none of our forwards look remotely like doing much on the scoreboard, so maybe time for Parker to have a run at Sandy, bring Steven in for Armo, but in a forward pocket role rather than onball, Paton in for Parker. Hind stays and whoever else for White if he's injured.
To be fair i doubt he has had much goal kicking practice. Be spewing about that nowHopefully not....we don’t want another player close to goal who can’t kick goals!
( sorry Whitey, I know you were injured.)
Probably too small to tag most midfielders but is big enough for Neale this week. Would be an interesting move from the coaches but I wouldn't mind seeing it.Wouldn't mind trialling Sinclair in the Steele run with role. Has the fitness, and it might teach him how to find the ball.