I would tag Guthrie.
Danger butchers the ball and is hard to tag.
Guthrie has become more effective and is tagga be.
Or Parfitt?
They seem like the 2 that will eventually take over from Selwood and Danger. (and are starting to already)
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I would tag Guthrie.
Danger butchers the ball and is hard to tag.
Guthrie has become more effective and is tagga be.
Don’t do it. It will only end in disappointmentI just realised we get an 8 day break to their 6. Now I'm starting to convince myself we're in with a chance.
I think team play better off a 6 day break. They shouldn't, but they do.I just realised we get an 8 day break to their 6. Now I'm starting to convince myself we're in with a chance.
I just realised we get an 8 day break to their 6. Now I'm starting to convince myself we're in with a chance.
Yes, tag Dangerfield. If his disposals are under pressure, he turns it over a lot.Disagree strongly in tagging Guthrie. He slows down the ball movement dramatically. Id love to see him get 45 stats. He is the player who collects the ball when they are struggling to move it really. Tagging Dangerfield is a no brainer really. He is the dynamic one who pushes it forward
In regards to Hawkins and Cameron id be inclined to let Cameron drift up the ground to pick up his seagull stats which is what I see happening.
GE by 31 | GE by 39 | GE by 36 | WC by 3 |
Good thing about Cameron is you can get away with Shep on him and that frees up GovDisagree strongly in tagging Guthrie. He slows down the ball movement dramatically. Id love to see him get 45 stats. He is the player who collects the ball when they are struggling to move it really. Tagging Dangerfield is a no brainer really. He is the dynamic one who pushes it forward
In regards to Hawkins and Cameron id be inclined to let Cameron drift up the ground to pick up his seagull stats which is what I see happening.
And who would you suggest we use? And who against?
Hutchings is nowhere near the player he was in 2018 and is struggling at WAFL level. Never getting a mention in the best players for a pretty average WAFL team.
Ainsworth has had a few decent if non-influential games for WAFL 2021, but wasn't a tagger.
Hutching just played his 1st half a game in the WAFL. So not easy to get best player when....you aren't playing.
Saying that the chances are his best is behind him and We need to look elsewhere. Hence Nelson getting the job.
XOn is likely to play 4 quarters. Hutch is not. That said, the medical sub rule could be a lifeline for Hutch- it is less of a risk playing a guy who has broken down the last 2 games he has played for us if there is an option to replace him should the pattern continue.Hutchings is a better option then XON at the moment. No question about that
Hutchings is a better option then XON at the moment. No question about that
So is Hutchings fit enough to even play at AFL level?
I'm talking match fit.
I would suggest he is a way off it and O'Neil a fair bit ahead of him fitness wise.
Who though? Cripps?Tag Stewart for goodness sake.
Nelson played a soft tag on both Pendles and Sidey. Pendles got a bit loose late but both were ineffective
Thought he was on Crisp most of the time.
But that’s not a great advert for his tagging if so, Crisp led the Pies in disposals and metres gained.
Strange, haven't watched a replay...thought he did a hard tag on Pendles, not a soft one.
Only because Pendlebury was unusually quiet. Interested to know any info.
Was feeling good about Nelly's game
Who though? Cripps?
Jeremy Cameron to make his Geelong debut against us, according to Scott.
Club said he needs a month of WAFL a long time ago so 3 more weeks
Im talking overall though. Once fit he is best 22 by a mile
Surely we can fit another ruckman into the side somewhere? What if Nic and Vardy both need to go to the toilet at the same time?Sounds like we need more talls.