moomba
TheBrownDog
Right to go ahead and play the game I feel, would have been unfair on Spurs after Leicester refused to play under similar circumstances.
When did that happen?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Right to go ahead and play the game I feel, would have been unfair on Spurs after Leicester refused to play under similar circumstances.
Draw was a great result for you guys, an inform Kane would have had a hatty.Draw not a bad result considering we had 5 covid outs and a league cup midfield playing. Right to go ahead and play the game I feel, would have been unfair on Spurs after Leicester refused to play under similar circumstances.
When did that happen?
I havent seen any announcement from Leicester about how many were unavailable for the Spurs game.Just found the number, Leicester had 2 additional players test positive, meaning in total they had at most 7 players out with COVID. That's the same as Chelsea isn't it?
I havent seen any announcement from Leicester about how many were unavailable for the Spurs game.
There were 7 unavailable for various reasons, then another two. But at that stage the Spurs game was still on. Presume they've had more cases since.
Brendan Rodgers revealed on Wednesday that the Foxes had sought a postponement as they expected to be without 11 players due to Covid and illness-related issues; that number has since rised, with two fresh Covid cases reported.
It's a bit confusing - I think possibly Jorginho and RLC were false positives? But they were kept out regardless. Not sure.Just found the number, Leicester had 2 additional players test positive, meaning in total they had at most 7 players out with COVID. That's the same as Chelsea isn't it?
Rodgers' argument was that their injuries were 'COVID related' because COVID meant they couldn't rotate the injured players which is just ridiculous logic to use. End of the day, the majority of their outs were normal run of the mill injuries, and they gamed the system.
So who knows what the numbers were, and no signs of Leicester refusing to play.Leicester City vs Tottenham called off amid further Covid chaos
Tottenham were due to travel to Leicester City in the Premier League tonight (Thursday, 7.30pm) but the game has now been called off as a result of the wave of coronavirus caseswww.mirror.co.uk
No, those extra two were the trigger for the cancellation.
So who knows what the numbers were, and no signs of Leicester refusing to play.
I did see something like this as well - technically we have 19 players "available" which I think just means not currently injured/COVID.Sorry? The article states quite clearly what the numbers were.
If Chelsea had false positives that's a different story, but it would be good to know what the threshold is. I.e. if Leeds get a single COVID case can they get their games called off because they have so few players available?
Sorry? The article states quite clearly what the numbers were.
If Chelsea had false positives that's a different story, but it would be good to know what the threshold is. I.e. if Leeds get a single COVID case can they get their games called off because they have so few players available?
Hmmmm
Hmmmm
If Jota's a penalty so was the one on Winks by MatipSo yeah, every big decision went Spurs' way.
Clear sending off for Kane, ignored.
Stone wall pen for Jota, ignored.
Every other decision was right. Just the two glaring wrong ones hurt us and helped Spurs but it is what it is. We just move on to the next one and try to keep winning every game.
Lol it's trashThat's the correct decision. Rules state that accidental handball isn't penalised except by the goalscorer itself.
Lol it's trash
Would've been ruled out when, last season?
I did see something like this as well - technically we have 19 players "available" which I think just means not currently injured/COVID.
Of those 19 players, there were a few nowhere near match fitness however and in our case included both backup keepers.
This is what I dont get, we have plenty of development squad and youf players to fill the bench with.The thing I don't quite understand with this is that yes you might have had 19 available from your senior squad (which always excludes players under 23 I'm 99% sure), but your u23s would include plenty of good players, for example Mount I'm pretty sure can be included in that squad. So while your senior squad is depleted, you would have still been able to name a more than competitive and quality 19 man matchday squad from the two.
Pretty sure TT mentioned they don’t want to use u23 squad because there in a different bubble.This is what I dont get, we have plenty of development squad and youf players to fill the bench with.
Pretty sure TT mentioned they don’t want to use u23 squad because there in a different bubble.
There you go, thanks mate makes sense now.Pretty sure TT mentioned they don’t want to use u23 squad because there in a different bubble.
Yeah I think what Hamez said is correct with keeping separate bubbles. Might have been different as well if it was a home game.The thing I don't quite understand with this is that yes you might have had 19 available from your senior squad (which always excludes players under 23 I'm 99% sure), but your u23s would include plenty of good players, for example Mount I'm pretty sure can be included in that squad. So while your senior squad is depleted, you would have still been able to name a more than competitive and quality 19 man matchday squad from the two.