Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Come to think of it, Geelong probably had a few of those in the Aasta O'Connor years. Surprising they're on track to go somewhere near that today though.And they did it with just 5 hitouts for the game, can't think of another time when an AFLW team would've had so few.
Usually teams visit Moorabbin, control the play, and spray their shots on goal.
Here's an assortment of grounds around Melbourne and respective goal-kicking accuracy for AFLW games. Stats say there's little or no disadvantage to the visitors for the first three examples.
Swinburne Centre (11 games)
Richmond: 44.4%
Away team: 46.7%
Arden Street Oval (7 games)
North Melb.: 44.3%
Away team: 52.6%
Ikon Park (27 games)
Carlton: 51.6%
Away team: 48.5%
RSEA Park (11 games)
St Kilda: 46.2%
Away team: 40.2%
There are always exceptions (GWS kicking 7.3 in pouring rain, think most goals came from like a metre out that day). But the Pies have kinda been in autopilot mode and they might find it hard to shake it off at this venue, so maybe they'll do just enough to get over the line again.
I've been of the opinion the last touch rule needs to go for a while.
It really doesn't add anything to game.
It just punishes teams going for a quick clearance.I could understand it at the start to try and get the game flowing as it was more territory (well still is) but it should be considered removing as players are better.l at ball movement now.
I've been of the opinion the last touch rule needs to go for a while.
It really doesn't add anything to game.
The last touch rule can be incredibly frustrating, but I think the current crop of AFLW coaches would show it's value pretty quickly if it was ever removed. Everything is already so defensively focused. Without the last touch rule, the ball would just spend more time around the boundary. Plus, we're already losing so much time on the clocks to stoppages and throw-ins are worse than ball-ups in that regard. At least the last touch usually gets it back in play faster.I've been of the opinion the last touch rule needs to go for a while.
It really doesn't add anything to game.
Teams go to the boundary as is. The boundary umpires are won't pay last touch unless it obvious.The last touch rule can be incredibly frustrating, but I think the current crop of AFLW coaches would show it's value pretty quickly if it was ever removed. Everything is already so defensively focused. Without the last touch rule, the ball would just spend more time around the boundary. Plus, we're already losing so much time on the clocks to stoppages and throw-ins are worse than ball-ups in that regard. At least the last touch usually gets it back in play faster.
They're only supposed to pay a free if it comes off a boot or from a proper handball. A fumble over the line is supposed to be a throw-in.Teams go to the boundary as is. The boundary umpires are won't pay last touch unless it obvious.
Many a fumble gets paid as a throw in.
They're only supposed to pay a free if it comes off a boot or from a proper handball. A fumble over the line is supposed to be a throw-in.
And I agree that teams already go boundary - what I'm saying is they'll go boundary even more if you get rid of the rule. We'll wind up with more stoppages and I think that's the last thing the game needs.