- May 4, 2013
- 5,593
- 13,013
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Ramma has the fitness to play a whole AFL game so if a second key forward is needed I'd play him
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
I'm confused, what does this mean? Did we get better after losing intensity or did we move up to fifth?Geelong kick two back to back and that's the game.
Plenty of stuff to like after we didn't leave fourth gear in the first half.
I couldn't hear him much on the field so you could be right. Or are you doing your Brian Taylor impersonation?I thought Chol looked laconic at times.
Too soon?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I'm confused, what does this mean? Did we get better after losing intensity or did we move up to fifth?
Did Scrimshaw play today?
Was there an un-televised 5th period to this game?
He was outstanding. We're blessed.Jeez - how good was Battle?
Can’t wait for Barrass to join him.
Midfield looked amazing. I reckon Jai is gonna win a Brownlow this year. He is just a bull who has now developed some class.I reckon Worps is in for a huge 2025.
He's entering a contract year and is in his absolute prime years.
He's also fit and in a good head space.
Barass would have been the solution to the Neale problem and of our small backs Impey would have given us some grit at ground level, but you’re underselling Geelong’s performance. They were picking our forward thrusts off and killing us on the rebound. I don’t know how many times their small forwards got goal side of their opponent, but it happened regularly. And that’s on the guys up the ground unable to disrupt their ball movement. They’re ball movement particularly early was superior to ours.This is not overblown but Geelong don't score half their score with a full strength backline in place. I counted at least a dozen times Barrass would have killed the contest if he was out there. Likewise with the run from the backline. We were easily missing more important players to the structure. If I was a Cats fans I wouldn't be getting too excited based on those facts I've mentioned. When we were at full throttle intensity for basically 10 mins a QTR we were making them look pedestrian without the usual run and slingshot from half back. There's no way they will get that many looks in the regular season Mitch would have gone to work on a team like Geelong who gave us problems last year.
That was more about hospital turnovers than anything else. Hawks ball use early was pretty rusty.Barass would have been the solution to the Neale problem and of our small backs Impey would have given us some grit at ground level, but you’re underselling Geelong’s performance. They were picking our forward thrusts off and killing us on the rebound. I don’t know how many times they’re small forwards got goal side of their opponent, but it happened regularly. And that’s on the guys up the ground unable to disrupt their ball movement. They’re ball movement particularly early was superior to ours.
When we had it on our terms we were scoring regularly, Lewis and Dear down there prevents as much intercept marking which propelled alot of their ball movement, that's where it started. You can't look at today and think we'll that's it Geelong have our number again when at least 6-8 players crucial to the structure weren't out there. Which Cats players that weren't playing would have made a significant difference to how they went about it. The entire last QTR was Sam experimenting when we could have easily gone best team to try and win the game. Not worried in the slightest, we have a way higher ceiling then them.Barass would have been the solution to the Neale problem and of our small backs Impey would have given us some grit at ground level, but you’re underselling Geelong’s performance. They were picking our forward thrusts off and killing us on the rebound. I don’t know how many times they’re small forwards got goal side of their opponent, but it happened regularly. And that’s on the guys up the ground unable to disrupt their ball movement. They’re ball movement particularly early was superior to ours.
More a not so subtle throwback to the various threads from last year. Hence the "Too soon?"I couldn't hear him much on the field so you could be right. Or are you doing your Brian Taylor impersonation?
Were only short ATM because Lewis and Dear aren't in the Forward line. Full strength best 22 we have all bases covered. Lewis should play further up the ground which will allow him to create the contest down the line every week. Even someone like Battle or Weddle can push up to a wing too. We couldn't do that today because Barrass wasn't there to anchor and goal keep 30m out from goal.I just watched the replay nothing to be worried about, it was anyone game with 5mins to go!
Once we started carrying the ball we got a nice run on in Q2 & Q3. 8 out of 11 goals in and really opened it up!
I thought a few of the seniour brigade took a while to get going in the first half (W.day carried them)
Will be interesting what we do up fwd or who the relief ruck is, we are short across the ground in the contest down the line!
If McCabe, Ramma, or the two ruck set-up is not preferred. I feel Weddle should play half forward until the cattle returns.
Maybe Weddle and McCabe could share the role!
Worpel, Day and Newcombe looked exceptional.
Mackenzie, Maginness and Morrison probably in my best players as well.
Love having Battle in brown and gold.
Special mention to the two brilliant individual efforts from Bodie Ryan. Dimma 2.0?
Extra special mention to how good our 'training' jumper looked in a game.
He isn't the answer but if he drops back to a 3rd tall role that is when we will get the best out of him. The forward setup should be Lewis, Dear and Chol with Gunston filling in on occasions for certain teams and matchups. We won't be getting this scenario till at least mid year so we will experiment with what we think will work in the interim.Not sure Chol is the answer also without Dear as his not dominant in the air.
He isn't the answer but if he drops back to a 3rd tall role that is when we will get the best out of him. The forward setup should be Lewis, Dear and Chol with Gunston filling in on occasions for certain teams and matchups. We won't be getting this scenario till at least mid year so we will experiment with what we think will work in the interim.