2016 trade hypotheticals

Remove this Banner Ad

That was the word.

But this time it appears to be back loaded.
And we are pushing to have his dads salary taken off the cap as well.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

But that doesn't make any sense at all. The whole argument about justifying his huge salary was the fact that they had to pay someone in the first couple of years. It was sold as $2m in the first year.

It's a non issue but it's interesting because someone was either lying back then or they are now. Why the club thought they needed to do that is strange
 
IF JOM is interested in joining Carlton

Kruezer + 1st round pick 2017

For JOM.

Gold Cost get an experienced player in Kruezer and potentially a young gun. Win/Win IMO

Injury plagued player for another injury plagued player, makes sense although I doubt GC would be happy with it
 
But that doesn't make any sense at all. The whole argument about justifying his huge salary was the fact that they had to pay someone in the first couple of years. It was sold as $2m in the first year.

It's a non issue but it's interesting because someone was either lying back then or they are now. Why the club thought they needed to do that is strange
How so? He still would of been on a bit in the final year of this contract
The new one starts up and is backloaded.
We save a tone for 2017 and along with the couple of players we know are going and hopefully Phil's salary taken off.

No fire sale required. Despite Barretts wish list.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
 

Log in to remove this ad.

WCE apparently into him (Lobb) big time how about a four way with us GWS and Freo
Hill and our first to Freo
Lobb to WCE
McCarthy to Freo
Pick 3 to GWS
Sheuy to Hawks
:)
Lol no. Hawks make out like bandits. West Coast massively ripped off.
 
How so? He still would of been on a bit in the final year of this contract
The new one starts up and is backloaded.
We save a tone for 2017 and along with the couple of players we know are going and hopefully Phil's salary taken off.

No fire sale required. Despite Barretts wish list.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk

When does his new one start?
 
I've heard a few people suggest variations of this trade.
I don't totally get it myself.
Essendon would be giving up the 2 best assets in the deal IMO

More realistically
Hibberd + Ess 4th
for
Salem and 27

That's if they are even willing to give up Salem/if he wants to go

Best one I have seen
 
Witts and pick 46 to Brisbane for picks 19, 38
Cloke pick 19 and 38 to the Dogs for Jong, 12 and 32
Williams to West Coast for a future second rounder.
Blair a FA, third round compo pick.
 
Gonna take a punt here with a few hypotheticals.

Trade 1
Essendon Gain: Pick 27 and Grimes or Salem
Melbourne Gain: Hibberd, pick 37

Trade 2
Fremantle Gain: Brad Hill
Hawthorn Gain: Pick 57

Trade 3
Richmond Gain: Cloke, Pick 49, Pick 69
Carlton Gain: Vickery, Pick 59, Pick 62
Collingwood Gain: Jong, Pick 43, Pick 77
Western Bulldogs Gain: Casboult, Pick 44, Pick 61

Thoughts?
 
Gonna take a punt here with a few hypotheticals.

Trade 1
Essendon Gain: Pick 27 and Grimes or Salem
Melbourne Gain: Hibberd, pick 37

Trade 2
Fremantle Gain: Brad Hill
Hawthorn Gain: Pick 57

Trade 3
Richmond Gain: Cloke, Pick 49, Pick 69
Carlton Gain: Vickery, Pick 59, Pick 62
Collingwood Gain: Jong, Pick 43, Pick 77
Western Bulldogs Gain: Casboult, Pick 44, Pick 61

Thoughts?

Hill for Pick 57? It's not Josh Hill. Although I'd love to get Hill for that pick!
 
Gonna take a punt here with a few hypotheticals.

Trade 1
Essendon Gain: Pick 27 and Grimes or Salem
Melbourne Gain: Hibberd, pick 37

Trade 2
Fremantle Gain: Brad Hill
Hawthorn Gain: Pick 57

Trade 3
Richmond Gain: Cloke, Pick 49, Pick 69
Carlton Gain: Vickery, Pick 59, Pick 62
Collingwood Gain: Jong, Pick 43, Pick 77
Western Bulldogs Gain: Casboult, Pick 44, Pick 61

Thoughts?

Hibberd is not worth more than Salem let alone Salem and Grimes.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Gonna take a punt here with a few hypotheticals.

Trade 1
Essendon Gain: Pick 27 and Grimes or Salem
Melbourne Gain: Hibberd, pick 37

Trade 2
Fremantle Gain: Brad Hill
Hawthorn Gain: Pick 57

Trade 3
Richmond Gain: Cloke, Pick 49, Pick 69
Carlton Gain: Vickery, Pick 59, Pick 62
Collingwood Gain: Jong, Pick 43, Pick 77
Western Bulldogs Gain: Casboult, Pick 44, Pick 61

Thoughts?
Thoughts?

Well my first thought was you're still drunk from yesterday.

Sent from my E6653 using Tapatalk
 
Witts and pick 46 to Brisbane for picks 19, 38
Cloke pick 19 and 38 to the Dogs for Jong, 12 and 32
Williams to West Coast for a future second rounder.
Blair a FA, third round compo pick.
Brisbane paying a hefty price for a lemon. Pick 19 is a good return yet they're giving an extra pick upgrade? ditto Bulldogs. Williams deal does sound reasonable though :thumbsu:
 
Witts is a terrible footballer and worth basically nothing.

Wouldnt get a game for Brisbane yet they are required to give up more than what Hawthorn got for buddy?

Please.


Witts + 24 for pick 20 and that's if they want the steaming pile of turd.
 
Alex rance for pick 3
Michael hibberd for Melbourne pick 26
Jaeger omeara to Essendon for pick 19 and 2017 first round
 
Witts and pick 46 to Brisbane for picks 19, 38
Cloke pick 19 and 38 to the Dogs for Jong, 12 and 32
Williams to West Coast for a future second rounder.
Blair a FA, third round compo pick.

Yeah pick 38 would be brisbanes offer for witts. Maybe a team might go higher , but certainly Brisbane wouldn't part with 19 much less more than that.
 
You seriously think a new coach will step out of a draft in his first year ... madness. Melbourne are in no position to do that.

Demons goal in the trade period will be to gain Hibberd and improve their picks - not lose them.

ESS Out/Melb In: Hibberd, Pick 19
ESS In/Melb Out: Picks 26, 27, Grimes

or

ESS Out/Melb In: Hibberd, Pick 19 ( 948 )
ESS In/Melb Out: P ( 730 ) ( 700 ) + Grimes (350)

Values Hibberd at Pick 22

Why would Essendon want grimes ?



Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top