These are the comparative stats between Crocker and Tom Stewart (who got votes against us on the weekend)I thought about it yesterday and I came to realise he is the typical type of player ONLY Collingwood recruits.
Like, literally no other club would ever have recruited Crocker. He went at like pick 60 or something? No one else would have picked him, which is exactly why we picked him I feel.
He has not a single discernible weapon at his disposal that would warrant drafting let alone selection in the seniors and yet somehow he continues to get games in our side. For all the improvement we seem to have shown this year, our selection is still deplorable.
Ben Crocker 188cm - 83kg - 21yo
Tom Stewart 190cm - 88kg -25yo
So Stewart is 5 years older and 5kg heavier, so don't you think Tom Stewart is going to have more of an impact on the game than Ben Crocker at this stage of their careers? With Stewart he's basically at his peak. Crocker won't reach his for another 4-5 years but already people want to write Ben Crocker off. How about we give some time for Crocker to grow into his body and keep learning the game?