Bradesmaen
TheBrownDog
Does alright versus Tassie and VicHead beats up on shitty WA bowlers twice a season but doesn't do much against everyone else
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Does alright versus Tassie and VicHead beats up on shitty WA bowlers twice a season but doesn't do much against everyone else
Absolutely agree, he needs competitive game time. Take him as a developmental player on an off-season tour if you must do that. Yes, he gets to be a net bowler in Indian conditions, but only a net bowler.Would have been better if he were playing for Queensland in Shield cricket IMO. What do everyone think the practice game XI will be? I'd be going with:
Renshaw
S Marsh
Khawaja
Handscomb
Wade (+, c)
Maxwell (for the lols)
M Marsh
Agar
O'Keefe
Starc
Bird
The top 3 are essentially competing for the openers and #3 spot (if Renshaw outperforms Khawaja Marsh bats 3), Maxwell and Marsh are competing for the allrounder spot, Agar and O'Keefe for the second spinner spot and Starc and Bird competing for the second seamer spot.
Geez...you need some educating about fast bowling mate.
Sayers and Bird are very different bowlers. Have you seen Bird swing the ball lately? I like Bird but without bounce he will be gobbled up.
Sayers would have been touring if he had been selected to play a test on home soil and was able to prove himself. I still can't believe he wasn't given an opportunity.
I struggle to see how you could lol at the thought of Head being selected.
How dare you bring shield stats to this conversation? What relevance does shield cricket have to test cricket?Once again, where is your proof? In the last 1.5 years of shield cricket he has got out just 6 times to 5 different spinners while enjoying the best form of his career.
Nah. I might have picked Maxwell and I can sort of support the selection of Swepson. Shaun Marsh's selection is a no-brainer. BBL form doesn't determine Test selection.Shaun Marsh 100% deserves selection. The two biggest mistakes with this squad are Maxwell and Swepson.
Maxwell hasn't made runs or taken wickets in FC cricket ergo shouldn't be selected. Swepson's selection basically hinders his development, which is my problem with it. I'd rather him play 5 games in the Shield than tour India.Nah. I might have picked Maxwell and I can sort of support the selection of Swepson. Shaun Marsh's selection is a no-brainer. BBL form doesn't determine Test selection.
The 2 I wouldn't have picked are Mitch Marsh and Agar. I would have taken Cummins as one of my choices instead. How long can someone be wrapped in cotton wool? At some stage he has to play Test cricket again.
Head is horse poo against spin bowling.
Sayers is going to swing the ball in India?
Mitch Marsh can bat?Maxwell hasn't made runs or taken wickets in FC cricket ergo shouldn't be selected. Swepson's selection basically hinders his development, which is my problem with it. I'd rather him play 5 games in the Shield than tour India.
Mitch Marsh makes sense somewhat, he's a fit fast bowler who can bat a bit. I think they see him as the fourth in line seamer rather than a top 7 bat. Cummins? Absolutely not. Let him play First Class Cricket before we rush him back into the test arena.
Cummins needs to play FC cricket before tests. We have no idea how he bowls atm, bowling a FC line is completly different to how one would bowl in a ODI line. I also have a feeling they want to take it easy, let him play FC and if he gets through all that then save him for the Ashes later in the year.Nah. I might have picked Maxwell and I can sort of support the selection of Swepson. Shaun Marsh's selection is a no-brainer. BBL form doesn't determine Test selection.
The 2 I wouldn't have picked are Mitch Marsh and Agar. I would have taken Cummins as one of my choices instead. How long can someone be wrapped in cotton wool? At some stage he has to play Test cricket again.
See, l don't see how it would hinder his development... It would be a different type of training, bowling on SC wickets. Him being a net bowler and playing in the trial games and tbh l wouldn't put it out of the question of him earning a recall. I know that we are going to get absolutly smashed and throughout the series there will be people asking for change. I don't have a problem with it, shows he is close to a debut if he really puts in the effort. (Some bowlers coast through their development because they know they are so far away from a debut, if ever). And l don't know if he would miss 5 games, l will have to check on that.Maxwell hasn't made runs or taken wickets in FC cricket ergo shouldn't be selected. Swepson's selection basically hinders his development, which is my problem with it. I'd rather him play 5 games in the Shield than tour India.
Mitch Marsh makes sense somewhat, he's a fit fast bowler who can bat a bit. I think they see him as the fourth in line seamer rather than a top 7 bat. Cummins? Absolutely not. Let him play First Class Cricket before we rush him back into the test arena.
100% agreeI don't understand how it is considered right and proper to drop Jackson Bird for a second spinner on turning decks, but it a grievous sin to drop a bloke on turning decks for someone who is half decent against spin. It is illogical.
Bird will swing the ball?Head is horse poo against spin bowling.
Sayers is going to swing the ball in India?
Bird will swing the ball?
What's wrong with letting them just get their bodies used to playing first-class cricket? Cummins hasn't played a first-class match since mid 2015 and Patto hasn't played one since the New Zealand tour last year.http://www.theage.com.au/sport/cric...-in-frame-for-india-tour-20170117-gtszlw.html
CA planning to send Cummins and/or Pattinson over there.
SNUBBED Victorian spinner Jon Holland has taken a swipe at Cricket Australia selectors and hierarchy for “no communication” in regards to his omission from the Test squad.
Holland’s name didn’t appear in the 16-man squad announced by chief selector Trevor Hohns on Sunday for next month’s four-Test tour of India.
http://www.news.com.au/sport/cricke...b/news-story/8610a213be8dcde746a902e06ea90531
27 wickets @ 18.48 vs Swepsons 10 wickets @ 43, understandable that he's salty.
Agar?Would have been O'Keefe vs Holland. Not sure we were ever taking both.
Agar?
Agar as an AR. Australian cricket is in a more dire situation than I imagined.Picked as an AR. Different type of selection.
In all likelihood Okeefe and Holland give you the same with the ball. Okeefe can bat and field a lot better.
Agar as an AR. Australian cricket is in a more dire situation than I imagined.