Get your facts right as you know that the siren should have gone before the goal was scored. Back to the old saying every dog has their day and that ch@@t has to live with what he did.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
B Section 2009 - Part 2
- Thread starter bedford
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Status
man in outer
Team Captain
Re: B Section 2009
Point taken.
MIO, more like the Hampton boys are making themselves look very ordinary, leave Ormond out of this 'district' group.
CC just don't bite at them, obviously that is all they are looking to do.
Point taken.
BrianSpeaking
Cancelled
Re: B Section 2009
Agree with your sentiments with Snowdogs, smashed last week by the side who was beaten by Carey the week before, with OH and SKOB to come. Only thing up their sleeve is their record vs SKOB.
Ahh how great it is, the return of the great man, one of the originals from from ECW, I mean BF, welcome back Doc.
Agree with your sentiments with Snowdogs, smashed last week by the side who was beaten by Carey the week before, with OH and SKOB to come. Only thing up their sleeve is their record vs SKOB.
- Banned
- #4
Re: B Section 2009
Hows this guys logic?
An independent hearing dismissed Ormond's claims and he tells me to get my facts right?
I am sorry, the VAFA certainly don't agree with your assertion.
Hows this guys logic?
An independent hearing dismissed Ormond's claims and he tells me to get my facts right?
I am sorry, the VAFA certainly don't agree with your assertion.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
BrianSpeaking
Cancelled
Re: B Section 2009
He is rightly pissed off SR, it has cost them their place in B Section, plus losing 9 in a row.
He is rightly pissed off SR, it has cost them their place in B Section, plus losing 9 in a row.
- Banned
- #6
Chris Griffin
Senior List
Re: B Section 2009
Dont start counting the chickens in the yard just yet. Dogs to hit back hard!
Dont start counting the chickens in the yard just yet. Dogs to hit back hard!
MurphysLaw
Team Captain
Re: B Section 2009
yeah wouldn't write us off to quickly just yet
B Section1st Semi Final6/09/2009Box Hill City Oval2pm2nd Semi Final5/09/2009Box Hill City Oval*2pmPreliminary Final12/09/2009Sportscover Arena2pmGrand Final19/09/2009Sportscover Arena2.15pm
Could be a slight advantage to the team that wins the prelim.... gets a game on EP (provided all their players come up) ...1st semi winner does not
September footy at EP is a lot different to H&A
forgot to put in my lock of the week
guna go with skob at gordan barnard reserve
ML
yeah wouldn't write us off to quickly just yet
B Section1st Semi Final6/09/2009Box Hill City Oval2pm2nd Semi Final5/09/2009Box Hill City Oval*2pmPreliminary Final12/09/2009Sportscover Arena2pmGrand Final19/09/2009Sportscover Arena2.15pm
Could be a slight advantage to the team that wins the prelim.... gets a game on EP (provided all their players come up) ...1st semi winner does not
September footy at EP is a lot different to H&A
forgot to put in my lock of the week
guna go with skob at gordan barnard reserve
ML
- Thread starter
- #9
Re: B Section 2009
Your right BS, we are pissed off. Maybe SR can give his version of events
bouncing back
Team Captain
Re: B Section 2009
really mr speaking!! i thought there were 2 games to go and just as the 4 isn't set neither are the teams headed for 'c' grade. alot of what you put forward as fact quickly turns into fiction. you're alot like the brand protector
when it comes to that.
imho the wellers and carey are still the ones most likely to head south. it should be much clearer by saturday evening - both the 4 and the relegation.
really mr speaking!! i thought there were 2 games to go and just as the 4 isn't set neither are the teams headed for 'c' grade. alot of what you put forward as fact quickly turns into fiction. you're alot like the brand protector
when it comes to that.imho the wellers and carey are still the ones most likely to head south. it should be much clearer by saturday evening - both the 4 and the relegation.
- Banned
- #11
Re: B Section 2009
Can we make a list of all the Hampton Rover flogs so we can ignore them (or it)
i think:
Bouncing ****
campaignerzy
Hawks09 (what a joke)
Pinto09
any others?
Hopefully all gone in 2 weeks
really mr speaking!! i thought there were 2 games to go and just as the 4 isn't set neither are the teams headed for 'c' grade. alot of what you put forward as fact quickly turns into fiction. you're alot like the brand protector
imho the wellers and carey are still the ones most likely to head south. it should be much clearer by saturday evening - both the 4 and the relegation.
Can we make a list of all the Hampton Rover flogs so we can ignore them (or it)
i think:
Bouncing ****
campaignerzy
Hawks09 (what a joke)
Pinto09
any others?
Hopefully all gone in 2 weeks
- Banned
- #12
Re: B Section 2009
You may be right( although i think the wellers and ORmond will go) .
I don't have to give an version of any events- I repeat all versions were heard by an independent tribunal and Ormond's version wasn't found to be true.
move on please
really mr speaking!! i thought there were 2 games to go and just as the 4 isn't set neither are the teams headed for 'c' grade. alot of what you put forward as fact quickly turns into fiction. you're alot like the brand protector
imho the wellers and carey are still the ones most likely to head south. it should be much clearer by saturday evening - both the 4 and the relegation.
You may be right( although i think the wellers and ORmond will go) .
I don't have to give an version of any events- I repeat all versions were heard by an independent tribunal and Ormond's version wasn't found to be true.
move on please
Re: B Section 2009
Give it a rest 'notr'. They're just protecting their club from the slagging we've received, much like everyone else looks after their own. To be fair a few of the lads haven't done us any favours with some of the posts, but good on them for having a crack to "protect their brand". There's nothing that can be done to change what's happened. The boys are just looking forward to giving a good honest account of themselves over the next fortnight and holding onto their spot in B Section.
I think it's time we all moved on from the BS surrounding the 'king hit' and focus on the next 2 weeks.
Give it a rest 'notr'. They're just protecting their club from the slagging we've received, much like everyone else looks after their own. To be fair a few of the lads haven't done us any favours with some of the posts, but good on them for having a crack to "protect their brand". There's nothing that can be done to change what's happened. The boys are just looking forward to giving a good honest account of themselves over the next fortnight and holding onto their spot in B Section.
I think it's time we all moved on from the BS surrounding the 'king hit' and focus on the next 2 weeks.
bouncing back
Team Captain
Re: B Section 2009
sausage,
i've made no comment about the ormond issue or about ormond. please don't include me in that matter.
sausage,
i've made no comment about the ormond issue or about ormond. please don't include me in that matter.
- Banned
- #15
bouncing back
Team Captain
Re: B Section 2009
at last a voice of reason. i note 'notr' is very protective of the brand protector and a st kilda supporter too. hmmm!
at last a voice of reason. i note 'notr' is very protective of the brand protector and a st kilda supporter too. hmmm!
- Banned
- #17
- Thread starter
- #18
Re: B Section 2009
The reason you won't give your version is because the truth hurts.
Re: B Section 2009
man up bedford, if the vafa didn't do anything about it, crying on here won't help...
and NOTR, a shit joke doesn't get funny the second time around.
hater.
man up bedford, if the vafa didn't do anything about it, crying on here won't help...
and NOTR, a shit joke doesn't get funny the second time around.
hater.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
- Banned
- #20
Re: B Section 2009
Old Carey
St Kevins
OM
OT
OH
Old Carey
St Kevins
OM
OT
OH
BrianSpeaking
Cancelled
Re: B Section 2009
WTF??? Josh Mahns hasn't played all year and wont.
Carey
SKOB
OH
OM
UB
WTF??? Josh Mahns hasn't played all year and wont.
Carey
SKOB
OH
OM
UB
Gunn Reserve
Team Captain
Re: B Section 2009
ORMOND v OLD CAREY
OLD CAMBERWELL v ST KEVINS
OLD MELBURNIANS v HAMPTON ROVERS
OLD TRINITY v UNI BLACKS
ST BERNARDS v OLD HAILEYBURY
ORMOND v OLD CAREY
OLD CAMBERWELL v ST KEVINS
OLD MELBURNIANS v HAMPTON ROVERS
OLD TRINITY v UNI BLACKS
ST BERNARDS v OLD HAILEYBURY
Cardio Carl
Cancelled
ORMOND v OLD CAREY -:- win and next week becomes less important
OLD CAMBERWELL v ST KEVINS -:- a must to have a crack at the double chance
OLD MELBURNIANS v HAMPTON ROVERS-:- go you good thing
OLD TRINITY v UNI BLACKS -:- game of the round, if OT wins, then they plays finals - OT at home
ST BERNARDS v OLD HAILEYBURY -:- again, trying to protect the double chance and just sets up final round StB vs SKOB as a classic
OLD CAMBERWELL v ST KEVINS -:- a must to have a crack at the double chance
OLD MELBURNIANS v HAMPTON ROVERS-:- go you good thing
OLD TRINITY v UNI BLACKS -:- game of the round, if OT wins, then they plays finals - OT at home
ST BERNARDS v OLD HAILEYBURY -:- again, trying to protect the double chance and just sets up final round StB vs SKOB as a classic
Cardio Carl
Cancelled
Re: B Section 2009
OH BS?
Terrible last week, even I have jumped off them.
Done some $$ on them as well
OH BS?
Terrible last week, even I have jumped off them.
Done some $$ on them as well
- Status
